My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1992
>
10-12-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 2:15:02 PM
Creation date
4/16/2024 2:11:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD OCTOBER 12, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1621 - CONT. <br />Gaffron noted staff has discussed a retention pond.somewhere on the <br />property or eisewhere in th'^ neighborhood, which may be reaiized <br />at a later date. <br />Goetten clarified the applicants intend to use <br />foundation and asked if that foundation hts been <br />certified by a structural engineer. <br />the existing <br />inspected and <br />Mr. Johnson stated prior to purchasing the property, they had a <br />contractor visit the site who indicated, because of the 12 block <br />used, the foundation could support a second story. <br />Goetten explained that if the foundation is found to be unusable, <br />the City will require the house to be moved further back on the <br />property. <br />Callahan said the Planning Commission felt the driveway would focus <br />a major amount of water in a different location. He said he <br />hesitates allowing double the amount of hardcover within the 75- <br />250’ zone. <br />Butler felt, after review of the property, it is a very awkward <br />property and the applicants have a hardship for moving the garage <br />closer to the house. She agreed the driveway may create a river on <br />the property. <br />Mr. Johnson stated the run-off actually flows across the property <br />opposed to down the drive. He added, by decreasing the amount of <br />hardcover at the actual point of the water entering the property, <br />It will alley for better absorption. <br />Jabbour suggested they consider a smalI landing area or berm at the <br />top of the drive to prohibit water from Linden Lane entering the <br />property. <br />Gaffron noted Cook has recommended a 3* side-to-slde slope for the <br />driveway to help direct run-off to the sides rather than down the <br />length of the driveway. <br />Goetten agreed with Callahan that they should not allow the <br />applicants to double the amount of hardcover within a zone. She <br />said she would prefer the existing garage to remain in its present <br />location opposed to the new garage.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.