My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
10-12-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 2:15:02 PM
Creation date
4/16/2024 2:11:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ill <br />PHONE NO. <br />STATE OF <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATUR^r-^Se^pCES <br />WATERS, 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. HOT*' ni <br />(612) 772-7916 FILE NO. <br />October 5, 1992 [OCX <br />I • ^ • » <br />S iG9? <br />The Honorable Skip Johnson <br />Mayor, City of Mound <br />3018 Island View Drive <br />Mound, MN 55364 <br />Dear Mayor Johnson: <br />REVIEW AND COMMENT ON CITI SPRING PARK'S ^QUEST FOR FLEXIBILITY <br />FROM STATE OF MINNESOTA'S SHORELAMg STANDARDS <br />As required by the statewide shoreland management standards, the <br />Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DITR) <br />and the City of Spring Park are hereby notifying your city of <br />Spring Park's request for flexibility from the statewide standards <br />as outlined below, and in the enclosure prepared by the city's <br />consultant. In accordance with the rules, the Commissioner and the <br />city must solicit the input and approval of other governmental <br />bodies that could be affected or impacted by the alternate <br />controls. The city and the DNR are asking that your city provide <br />its review and comments, if any, to either DNR or the city within <br />45 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received <br />prior to then, we will assume that your city has no concerns with <br />the neighboring city's proposal. <br />The City of Spring Park is requesting flexibility from the <br />following statewide standards: <br />1. Lot size, <br />2. Residential density, <br />3. Impervious surface coverage, and <br />4. Building height. <br />Since the city'o request is complex, a thorough discussion of this <br />request is attached for you and/or your staff to review. Spring <br />Park has presented the above requests for review and discussion by <br />DNR and representatives of 11 Lake Minnetonka cities who are <br />working together as a Technical Review Committee for the purpose of <br />reviewing and discussing individual city's flexibility requests <br />affecting Lake Minnetonka. No problems with the city's request <br />have been noted at any of those meetings. <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.