My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
10-12-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 2:15:02 PM
Creation date
4/16/2024 2:11:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To:Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From; Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:October 1, 1992 <br />Subject; #1761 Mark Huns ley, 3464 East lake Street - Variance <br />(After-the-Fact ) - Resolution <br />Application: Request for after-the-fact variance to construct storage <br />shed on Outlot B, Bayside Beach. <br />Zoning District: LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 2 acre. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Resolution <br />Exhibit B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/23/92 <br />Exhibit C - Memo fit Exhibits of 9/16/92 <br />Discussion <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of September 16th. Briefly, <br />the applicant requests after-the-fact approval for construction of an <br />accessory storage shed on a property with no principal structure, and <br />requesting a variance for a setback from the side street lot line of <br />5.9' where a 50' setback would normally be required. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />At their September 21st meeting. Planning Commission voted 7-0 <br />for approval of setback variances to allow the 12'xl6' shed to remain <br />at its as-built location, and granting a variance to allow such <br />accessory structure on this outlot with no principal structure. <br />Planning Commission determined that one accessory structure on <br />this outlot is appropriate but any additional accessory structures <br />would not be looked at favorably. Planning Commission further <br />suggested that the resolution reflect that this is a unique outlot <br />situation in which three immediately adjacent property owners control <br />the use of the outlot, providing sufficient control of the site to <br />justify allowing an accessory structure without a principal structure <br />in this specific case. <br />Planning Commission recommended payment of after-the-fact <br />investigation fees for the zoning application and building permit, and <br />that the shed be brought into compliance with building code <br />requirements for such a structure. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission <br />recommendation. A resolution is attached for Council adoption.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.