My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
10-12-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 2:15:02 PM
Creation date
4/16/2024 2:11:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prom: <br />Date <br />5' <br />Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />October 6, 1992 <br />Subject: #1755 Leonard Niska, 2304 Shadywocd Road - <br />Variance/Conditional Use Permit (After-the-Fact) - Resolution <br />Application: Request for after-the-fact variances and "through lot" <br />CUP to construct a 140 s.f. storage shed. <br />Zoning District: LR-IC, 1/2 acre. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Discussion <br />Resolution <br />Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/23/92 <br />Planning Commission Minutes 9/21/92 <br />Memo and Exhibits of 9/16/92 <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of September 16th. Briefly, <br />applicant requests after-the-fact variance and conditional use permxt <br />approval for construction of a 10'xl4' storage shed in the side street <br />yard of this very small "through lot". Applicant was advised of the <br />requirement for demolitic.i and construction permits whi h could not be <br />issued until a survey was obtained. The survey indicated the pre <br />existing garage proposed to be rebuilt was actually over the lot <br />lines. Applicant made application for variances to construct a new <br />shed> then constructed the shed and demolished the garage without <br />obtaining permits or variance approval. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />At their September 21st meeting. Planning Cori^rdssion v. Led 7-0 to <br />reconuTiend approval of setback, hardcover and lo;: coverage variances <br />and a "through lot" conditional use pern.it to allow the shed to remain <br />at its as-built location. Planning Commission noted for the record <br />that the lot is so small that if a future Council grants approval for <br />a garage on the site, the shed should be removed. Planning Commission <br />conditioned their reconjnendation on: <br />1. Applicant must obtain the proper building permits and bring <br />the shed into compliance with building codes. <br />2. Applicant must pay after-the-fact investigation fees for the <br />building permit and zoning application.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.