Laserfiche WebLink
Milfoil Update <br />hv l\ttiicia McCullough, U'fivca/fl Bay <br />From the DNR... <br />In a discussion with Ti>in Sak. Milfoil Cin^rclinaior <br />for the Department of Natural Kesouacs, the <br />following update was obtained regarding the milfoil <br />problem in general. <br />• There have been fewer re^K>fts of new infestations <br />of lakes and waterways this year than last; in <br />1991, there were reports of 14-15 new lakes <br />infested as well as several ptxils on nver <br />backwaters; this year there have b^n only 5 new <br />lakes reporting infestation as well as the St. ('roix <br />River The weather could be impacting this. <br />With the cooler summer, the growth is slower and <br />mav not bt discovered until next year. <br />Divunguishing milf(M! from other aquatic growth is <br />not possible until it reaches the surface. <br />• Three lakes had programs for treatm^^nt this past <br />year that were cix>pcrative efforts among the <br />takeshoiv c ;n'*rs, the conservation districts, the <br />County and tl«; State. Three lakes that were <br />treated were Crooked Lake in Anoka, and Little <br />Green and Lllen Lakes in Chisago ('ounty. After <br />3 months. Crooked Lake still appears to be free <br />from milfoil, but a 12-18 month period will be <br />necessary before reaching conclusions. <br />• The legislature has provided luntling for research <br />for milfoil eradkatMso for the past several years, <br />even though the Stale has been in a defk ii budget <br />ntuation. The Department of N.nural Resources <br />has made advMKei m funding fi>r milfoil ircMment <br />leseardi. <br />• The mifor ttttif rritiiH lo fifid itir moai effective <br />tfcaimant for die dottars expended to ireai mtifml <br />CtwiMcai irraimcids hast been used lo dale m <br />as macRaaacal rrnvuvai through harsetung <br />ItBtogxal ifiWMi. eg. through hmgut or <br />msuct patfiogeiis. m being tailed by the DNK and <br />tn a foioi program amh the University of <br />Mimsesuu There baa not been enich pnvait <br />msai^rmeai IT. ttut type of treatment bcxaMie the <br />rket It net <br />f|jL\ A* Cipitee eeeifired eie poft ^ <br />From the LMCD... <br />Gene Strommen. Lxccutivc Director of the Lake <br />.Minnetonka Conservation Distnet, provided the <br />following update on the status of the proposed <br />treatment program for St. Alban ’s D.iy. <br />• The program is progressing. <br />• The LMCD has completed its aquatic plant <br />inventory, funded by the LMCD. to develop the <br />needed baselmc data This study cost $7,500. <br />Two major steps need to occur before the treatment <br />program becomes a reality: <br />• ('oncerns have been raised about the impact of the <br />proposed treatment program on the fish <br />population, particularly the young of that year, or <br />new hatch. Discussions arc currently under way <br />with the DNK Fisheries division and the Minnesota <br />Sp«>rtfishtng Cungrtu to work together to raise <br />fTH>ncy privately lo d** a fish inventory ilus fall, as <br />well as a '''*w hatch inventory next Spring, and the <br />following year, to ttetermine if there is any <br />adverse impact The anticipated cost of this <br />inventory is SI0.000 per year for two years The <br />threat, it appears, is not the chemical ’s impact cm <br />the ycHing hatch, tnit the removal of cover, e g., <br />milfoil and vHher aquatic vcgeution. makint tbc <br />young hatch more vulnerable to the prediKir fulL <br />• The funding needs to be secured. The cotf of the <br />treaiment program will be spproximalely $30,000. <br />Hennepin Conservation Ditfnct has ptedged emo* <br />half of the costs thren^h nudehmg funds, m <br />appnmmateiy $15,000 The LMCD will to <br />takeahorc owners m AJban'i Bay. BKiiiding <br />both mannas and pnvaie homes, lo lane die <br />balance of approtimaieiy $15,000 For many <br />owners, the raquemed conmbution will aoi he <br />iMi^ Afferent hwa dm money dmi duty hove <br />tlMCD 3