My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
09-28-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2024 12:39:11 PM
Creation date
4/15/2024 12:36:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.. .• i <br />propocties that are affected by changes in flood elevations, and <br />hydrologic calculations be submitted for different storm events. <br />Rick Wetzel, spokesman for the Gleason Lake Improvement <br />Wetzel feels one of the primary objectives of the project should <br />bo to return lake levels to what residents are used to <br />experiencing after a significant rain fall event, ^he Board of <br />the Gleason Lake Improvement Association recommends adoption oc <br />the proposed alternative with some additions that aie described in <br />tho proposed findings. The outstanding benefit for residents on <br />Gleason Lake is the potential for water quality improvements. The <br />Association feels that the Phase II portion of the project would <br />benefit them but would like to see the study expanded to include <br />the balance of the Gleason Creek watershed. <br />President Spensley stated that another benefit of the pond at <br />the inlet to Gleason Lake is that it allows for some additional <br />storage. The feasibility study is the formal first step in <br />authoriiliw tho project. If the Managers <br />the second phase couli not be authorized until the feasibility <br />study was done because other properties are directly affected. <br />Part of the focus of the watershed's overall comprehensive plan is <br />to improve water quality and increase stormwater storage in the <br />upper watershed. The Gleason Creek project focuses on that <br />Intention. <br />Art Peabody, 1297 Black Oaks Court, stated the creek adjacent <br />to the townhouses on the north shore of the lake Clows through <br />very rapidly, contributing a significant amount of sedi^nt. <br />Mr. Peabody would lik.3 to see tho water kept at bay to decrease <br />sediment loading. He is concerned about the timing of Phase li <br />which will not be considered until after Phase I is Implemented. <br />Art Xozorotski, 940 Garland Lane North, stated any temporary <br />increases in water level will not affect the residents nearly as <br />much on the north end of the lake as those residents who live to <br />the south. Mr. Kozerotskl is concerned that passage under the <br />bridge that is located between the north and south sides of tne <br />lake will bo difficult If the water reaches an approximate <br />elevation of 944.6. <br />Lee Wallace, 41S Comstock Lane, generally discussed some of <br />Che findings as they will beneficially affect the residents oC <br />Gleaaon Lake. w.illace strongly supports the project. <br />-3-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.