Laserfiche WebLink
LMCU BOARD OF DlKliCiURS AII u s t 26, 1992 <br />I.Mri) <br />deny <br />we re <br />t lie <br />Marina resultin^i in a court rulinp that recjuiri-'ii ilie marina to <br />briny its docks back to 200’ from 300’. There was later action <br />by the LMt.’D which allowed Noilh Shore Drive Marina to have more <br />dry slack storage than allcwed by the court order. The <br />Board, not aware of the Oronc court order, '.e I t it could not <br />that one marina something that other marinas on the Lake <br />allowed. Hurr and Jabbour said there were I vo court orders <br />one discussed by the committee is an Order it.volvinv the Marina <br />and the City of Orono. Babcock said li i s conc-rn is where the <br />LMc:D would have an exf'osure to enforce someone e.'se’s code. He <br />believes the city should enforce its code first. <br />VOTE: Motion ca»ried unanimously. <br />Grathwol suggested finding alternatives to the stipulations <br />attached to licenses. Cochran said the LMCD shoultl require com­ <br />pliance with tho.se items that relate to water and dock use. The <br />committee was asketl to reconimend wiirdinv to cover cunt ingencies <br />involving runing. <br />Owen was excused. <br />3) .Shorewood Yacht Club, tiideon’s Hay. ShorcwiuHl <br />MOTION: Babcock moved. Kascop seconded, to appiove renewal of <br />the Shorewood Yacht Club Multiple Dock License, without change. <br />VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. <br />4) Methodist Lakeside Assembly, Way rat a Bay. Wood­ <br />land <br />MOTION: Babcock moved. Slocum seconded, to amend the Multiple <br />Dock License of the Methodist Lakes’de Assembly trading 5 moor­ <br />ings from the District Mooring Area (DMA) for 5 boat lifts at the <br />deck, per site plan dated 2/3/92. amending the length from bO’ to <br />100’ and moving ) slips from docks on the west to the main dock, <br />subject to the east setback of 30’ being met. amending the DMA <br />from 7 moorings to 2. <br />J)lSCU.S.SION: Kascop asked about the swimming platform location. <br />Thibault responded that the Water Patrol has been asked to check <br />the locition. She said it appcnis. from the iliawing submitted, <br />that the swimming platforms are further out than ion . <br />Babcock asked if ns-buill surveys arc required. Thibault <br />responded that they itie not required for seasonal docks. <br />AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Penn moved. Hurr seconded, to require that <br />the swimming platforms be brought in to the 100* rone. <br />DISCUSSION: I'ochran said it is his understand trie that the W.iler <br />Patrol issues permits for structures such as swimming pl.ilfv*rms. <br />Babcock asked if there is an ordinance coverine this t % r»r of <br />structirv. LeFevere res|*on«!etl tb-»l they Fiave to be in the lH»ck <br />Use Area IIUA) or he grandfathered. Hr added, in resp«»nse to • <br />question from Mocum. that the IH'A is the determining houn.lirv. <br />not the DMh. rhe Dt A the area in which the ri pari an owner <br />conducts all kinds of activities such as host storage, swiiiming <br />platforms. «nd water ski jumps. Chandler «»ld. in issuing per- <br />mitn. the Hater Petrol looks ai the ItiO* aie* md the mmeigaliom <br />• tea <br />* I