My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
09-28-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2024 12:39:11 PM
Creation date
4/15/2024 12:36:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lanuowrHJrs would coritiiiue to have tiie <br />have now. <br />same property rights they <br />Impervious surface coverage of existing development was also <br />calculated on a detailed, lot-by-lot basis and then totaled for <br />each zoning district. It ranges from a low of 2% in u <br />residential area to 100% in one of the commercial districts. <br />Overall for the Minnetonka shoreland area it is R%. Ihe City is <br />proposing to allow impervious coverage in several of tne <br />districts lo exceed the 25% standard for nc developments (up to <br />possibly 75%) if structures and practices are in place to treat <br />storm water before discharge to the lake. All propo.sals which <br />would exceed the ordinance requirements would be required to meet <br />the objectives of the City’s Storm Water Management I’lan and <br />provide added physical protection for preserving water (]uality. <br />fhe City adopted the Flan in *88 and is now implementing it. <br />There was considerable discussion by members of several aspects <br />of the proposal. One asked if the City’s Flan covers storm water <br />runoi f from existing development lit does). Several also had <br />questions and comments about the rity’s proposed procedures for <br />allowing higher impervious limits and for keeping track of <br />"transfers" of allowed coverage. Members inquired about how DNR <br />responds to notices and what recourse they have if their <br />expressed concerns are not addressed in final dccisitms of. <br />cities. <br />HI. Follow-Ups on Flexibility .lequests <br />A. Spring Fark <br />Ed Pick mentioned the DNH still has .some aignif leant concerns and <br />will be meeting with /lien Brixius soon to discuss impervious <br />limits (storm water management), future redevelopment of the two <br />large manufacturing sites, and mapping of wetlands on the zonirg <br />map. <br />U. Woodland <br />Pick reported the standards for Minnetonka are settled, but <br />disagreement remains on one issue involving another lake. <br />that <br />C. Minnotr ista <br />Jay Blake explained that the City intends to tighten a lot width <br />standard and the standards for vegetation alterations. <br />D. Ot^e, cities , » I. i. <br />Member. .rom Mound. Deephaven. Shorrwood. and Minnetonka Beacli <br />will be ready for Mie September meeting. Bill lhib«»ilt. a <br />consulting planner, announced he has been ret»i:ned by '** <br />devoloj Its §► '-eland controls. Steve Freslin meiil loned he lias <br />reviewed a dr for Excelsior prepared by a consul laiil (Kcrmit <br />Cruut h). <br />IV. Next Meeting <br />Tne next meeting will be Sept 22 and <*111 last 4 hours
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.