My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
09-14-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2024 1:25:25 PM
Creation date
4/12/2024 1:21:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO:Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator <br />PROM;Stephen Weckman, On-Site System Manager <br />DATE;July 15, 1992 <br />SUBJECT: #1757 CUP - A. Hanser - Septic Review <br />Septic testing is required for this parcel indicating <br />alternate sites for both the guest house and the main residence. <br />During the review of this subdivision by Jean Mabusth, it was <br />determined that the ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka <br />encroachea within 75' of the existing guest house as well as the <br />septic system for the residence. This encroachment makes the <br />septic system non-conforming based on the shoreland regualtions <br />and revised spetic code requirements. Jean noted in her March 12, <br />1992 review for the subdivision request that additional testing <br />must be submitted indicating a second alternate drainfield site <br />for the guest house as well as the abandonment of the existing <br />septic system with the installation of the replacement system <br />using one of the alternate site for the guest house within one <br />year of the final subdivision. In order to be consistent with <br />Orono Septic Code Section 12.30 however, the septic system for <br />this guest house must be replaced within 90 days of the approval <br />of a CUP. <br />Mark Gronberg has been contacted regarding this issue and <br />indicated that the two alternate drainfield sites for the guest <br />house as well a'j the alternate site for the main residence should <br />be feasib'^e and will submit an addendum identifying these sites <br />on the property survey. As per our discussion, best way to <br />acheive adequate sites for sewage treatment would be to have one <br />alternate site for the guest house while extending the other <br />alternate site already designated to make i. large enough for <br />both the main residence as well as the guest house. Based on the <br />soil testing information already provided and previous <br />inspections of the property in question, the drainfield sites <br />should have no problem in treating septic effluent affectively. <br />1^.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.