Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 14. 1992 <br />ZONING FILE i1757 - CONT. <br />Mabusth stated they can add a condition in the conditional use <br />permit resolution with regard to the septic system and noted that <br />the subdivision application is completely separate from the <br />conditional use permit application, so that the conditional use <br />permit can be approvco and not hold up the subdivision. <br />Taylor said they would like an additional time period for testing. <br />It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution <br />#3176 for Application #1757 for Albert D. Hanser, 1685 Fox Street, <br />for a conditional use permit to allow the guest house use, amending <br />the condition allowing a one month testing period and if deemed <br />non-conforming, a one year time period to replace the system. Ayes <br />5, nays 0. <br />Hanser added that if the system needs to be replaced, it would <br />diminish his property values. <br />Gaffron stated he would be happy to meet the applicant and his site <br />evaluator on the site when the soil borings are commenced. <br />(#7) IM758 JAMES LAWRENCE, <br />1550 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - <br />CONDITIONAL USF PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3177 <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt <br />Resolution #3177 for Application #1758 for James Lawrence, 1550 <br />Sixth Avenue North, approving a conditional use permit for a guest <br />house use. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#8) §1759 P. PROFT/R. WELLS, <br />60/70 MYRTLEWOOD ROAD - <br />SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - RESOLUTION #3178 <br />Robert Mitchell was present to represent the applicants. <br />Mabusth explained the subdivision involves approximately 1/3 of an <br />acre, half of which is wetland. The Wells’ property currently <br />consists of 1.6 acres. The area proposed to be subdivided off could <br />not be used for septic purposes due to Its proximity to the <br />wetland. There is not an alternate septic site on the Weils’ <br />property, but the existing system could be expanded upon. The area <br />in question appears to be part of the Proft property. <br />Mitchell reviewed the Proft residence is oriented to face the <br />southwest. He stated without the Profts controlling the area, it <br />is an Invitation for a nuisance to occur in the future. The Profts <br />wish to stabilize the neighborhood situation. <br />1