Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE §1750 - CONT. <br />Hanson said from the beginning they knew they would have to make <br />concessions, and they tried to reduce the hardcover prior to <br />submitting the original proposal. After the first Planning <br />Commission meeting they were asked to reduce hardcover percentages <br />more, which they have done. <br />Jabbour noted that at one point a project becomes over ambitious <br />for the lot. He stated the City’s ordinances reflect their concern <br />about water run-off into the Lake. <br />Mr. Pyle said the first group of Planning Commission members to <br />review the proposal did visit the site and felt the project was <br />beneficial, but the second group did not inspect the property. <br />Goeiten stated she appreciates the cuts the applicants have <br />proposed, but felt the project too ambitious for the lot. She <br />agreed with the Planning Commission's recommendatI on of 18X total <br />lot coverage. <br />Mrs. Pyle referred to two small planting areas in the 0-75’ setback <br />area. She stated the boxes around the plantings and plastic <br />underneath could be removed. <br />Mabusth stated this would reduce 0-76’ hardcover by 177 s.f. <br />It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve <br />Application #1750 for Charles and Shirley Pyle, 3548 Ivy Place, for <br />variances to construct an addition to the existing residence, based <br />on Condition #1 of the resolution be removed and a condition that <br />the triangular planting areas and plastic underneath be removed, <br />and limiting lot area coverage to 21.5X. Ayes 2, nays 3. Callahan, <br />Jabbour and Goetten voted nay. Motion failed. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table AppIIcatIon <br />#1750 for Charles and Shirley Pyle for two weeks to allow the <br />applicants tima to reconsider their proposal. Ayes 3, nays 2. Mayor <br />Peterson and Butler voted nay. Motion carried. <br />Goetten explained that If the application were denied, the <br />appIicants wouId not be allowed to return with another proposal for <br />six months.