09-14-1992 Council Minutes2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning Pile #1748 September 10, 1992 Page 2 List of Bidiibits A B C D E P G H I J K Application Property Owners List Plat Map Survey Elevations Section Ploor Plan Hardcover Pact Sheet Planning Commission Minutes 7/20/92 Option A Option B Description of RiMiuest 'J’hirf application was originally reviewed at the July 20th meeting of the Planning Commission, rsv:.ew Exhibit 1. The request involved a 30' x 33' proposed jarage with area of structure at 990 s.f. (at 750 s.f. structures must be located 15* from aide lot lines) that was shown at 10* side setbacks. In addition, lot coverage was proposed at 1,827 s.f. or 15.5% where existing lot coverage was at 1,398 s.f. or 11.8%. The Planning Commission recommended denial as it was applicants' position that '.hey CGuld not reduce the size of the proposed garage based on the special storage needs. At the August 10th meeting of the Council, applicants made a special request to be rescheduled before the Planning Commission for further review of an amended plan. At the August 17th meeting of the Planning Commission, applicant presented an amended plan that now proposed a 25* x 36* structure. Total area was reduced from 990 s.f. to 900 s.f. Structure still requires a 15' aide setback. Note that at the -5' setback line, the lot measures 53' in width. Applicant has submitted two proposals. Option A, Exhibit J, preferred by applicant, places the structure closer to the north side lot line at 13' and meets the 15* setback at the south lot line. Option fl centers the detached structure at the mid*-point requlrimg a 1* side setback on both north andl south side lor lines. With the re »ised proposal there is no longer a need for a lot coverage variof»':e as lot coverage is now proposed at 14.7%. With both proposals there was never a need fcr a hardcover variancQ within the 250-500* setback area. The only variance sought now t>y applicant with revised plan is a side setbaclt variance. 1