My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
09-14-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2024 1:25:25 PM
Creation date
4/12/2024 1:21:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 17, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1759 - CONT. <br />Mitchell noted the Wells have agreed to deed a 6’ wide driveway <br />easement to the Profts after completion of this subdivision <br />process. <br />Sch-oeder asked what will happen if the Wells’ septic system fails. <br />Mitchell reported that Schirmers has determined that there is <br />enough room on the Wells’ property to fix their present system. He <br />added the Wells’ septic situation is not markedably different than <br />others on Myrtlewood Road. <br />It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Peterson, to recommend <br />approval of Application #1759 for P. Proft/R. Wells, 60/70 <br />/rtlewcod Road, for preliminary subdivision, including a variance <br />for 70 Myrtlewood Road to reduce a substandard lot area. Ayes 3, <br />nays 1. Bel lows voted nay. <br />(#2) #1737 RICHARD HOLLANDER, <br />680 NORTH ARM DRIVE - <br />.AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />The applicant requested that this issue be tabled until the next <br />Planning Commission meeting. <br />(#3) #1748 ROBERT 4 RITA HOVLAND, <br />1245 NORTH ARM DRIVE - <br />VARIANCES - <br />REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER REVIEW <br />Rita Hovland was present. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicants have revised their proposal <br />to a 900 s.f. garage, which will still require a 15 setback from <br />the side lot line. The garage is proposed at 25’x36’. She noted <br />with the revised proposal, a lot coverage variance is not <br />necessary. She advised the applicants prefer Option A, which would <br />require a side setback variance to only one side. She stated this <br />lot is a through lot and would need conditional use approval for <br />any accessory structure. <br />were asked to <br />fidb been donePeterson noted at the last review the applicants <br />reduce the structure into a smaller envelope which <br />He stated it was also suggested that the gravel parking area o.. <br />North Arm Drive be aoannoneJ.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.