Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 24, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE »1730 - CONT. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicant has installed the shared <br />drive, and the Septic Inspector confirmed that the septic system <br />was not destroyed. The septic system is now considered non- <br />conforming as it is 6’ from the shared drive, and the applicant has <br />one year in which to bring the system Into conformance. The <br />existing drive will continue to serve during the construction <br />period. The City is in receipt of a developer’s agreement and <br />acceptable security to cover the restoration of the former <br />driveway. <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconced by Butler, to adoot Resolution <br />•3172 for Application #1730 Gregg Malik, 3060 Sixth Avenue North, <br />approving the final subdivision. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(»#6) #1746 THOMAS & MARGARET LOWE, <br />2630 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3173 <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten. to adopt Resolution <br />#3173 for Application #1746 for Thomas and Margaret Lowe, 2630 West <br />Lafayette Road, for a variance to construct an addition to the <br />existing residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(»#7) #1753 SKIP MADGE, <br />875 FOREST ARMS LANE - <br />VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3174 <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution <br />#3174 for Application #1763 for Skip Madge, 876 Forest Ar.as Lane, <br />approving average lakeshore setback variances. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#8) SCOTT LARSON, 2112 SUGARWOODS DRIVE - <br />REQUEST DRIVEWAY REALIGNMENT <br />Scott Larson was present. <br />Mabusth explained tha first plan submitted was denied because of <br />the i^riveway realignment, which did not meet the reaulred <br />standards. A straight alignment was approved for the driveway when <br />the building permit was issued. <br />Larson reviewed the layout of the property and th® tooosraphy. He <br />stated with this proposal he has tried to install the enf'snce at <br />a level n|os#^ ro the elevation of tn® garage. Drainage wi I I <br />continue to flow from west to east. The proposed ^eal ignment <br />dIs t u rbs none of the existing vegetation, and extends the char act#r <br />of Sugarwoods development. He noted witn tne propoteo drive, <br />excava11ng cost s and retaining walla will be kept to a mini mum. <br />I <br />1