My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1992
>
09-14-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2024 1:25:25 PM
Creation date
4/12/2024 1:21:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 14. 1992 <br />(*#3) APPROVAL Or MINUTES <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to approve the minutes <br />of the regular Council meeting of August 24, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no public comments. <br />(#4) §1748 ROBERT & RITA HOVLAND, <br />1245 NORTH ARM DRIVE - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE <br />Rita Hovland was preserit. <br />Mabusth explained that the appiication was reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission at both the July and August meetings. Planning <br />Commission denied the amended proposal based on size of the <br />structure and the Planning Commission felt because of that size, <br />the structure should meet the setback ordinance. The building has <br />been reduced from 30’x33* to 25'x3e'. Lot coverage was no longer <br />an Issue. <br />Goetten suggested shifting the building thereby only requiring one <br />variance. She questioned the structure width of 25’ and noted <br />boards come in 24’ lengths. She stated it would be less et^oensive <br />to build the garage at a 24’ width. <br />Jabbour noted the applicants may have felt <br />more on one of the adjacent neighbors. He <br />comment on Qoetten’s question. <br />'•ley should not imp <br />arked Mrs. Hovia. j <br />>se <br />to <br />Hovland stated once the wails are up, a 24’ wide garage would be <br />reduced to 23’ of usable space inside and they need 24’. She <br />pointed out one Planning Commission member did vote fc* the <br />proposal because he felt they had followed the directives of the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Callahan referred to the minutes of the July 20th meeting where the <br />applicants stated the reason the large garage was needed was <br />because their son was moving into the house and has two vehicles <br />and a boat. He asked if the applicants were trying to isake the <br />property hold more equipment than is feasible. <br />Hovland noted the graveled area has been reduced to one car width <br />end win be used more as s convenience ee the garage it far fr<»i <br />the entrance to the front of the house.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.