Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 <br />HARREN - STUBBS BAY SEWER PROJECT - CONT. <br />Cook stated the cheapest way to hook the property to sewer would <br />be to run the pipe to the west, leaving the effluent pump in and <br />connecting it to the sewer iine. <br />Harren «%tated the pipe wouid then run through his grove of black <br />walnut trees and under his pooi. He stated the iine would be over <br />260’ . <br />Cook said the line would be half as expensive as the gravity line <br />to the east. <br />J^bbour asked the difference between the Harren and the Ilse <br />situation. <br />Gaffron said there was no difference, and the I Ises were given the <br />option of being excluded from the project. <br />Callahan agreed with Butler on the position of a future owner, and <br />suggested filing a document in the chain of title expressing the <br />City’s position that it will be the responsibility of the property <br />owner to connect to the sewer at a later date. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to exclude Lee <br />and Julie Harren’" nroperty at 175 Landmark Drive from the Stubbs <br />Bay sewer project, subject to the owner signing a document to be <br />filed within the chain of title notifying any future owner of the <br />responsibility to connect to the sewer at their expense within one <br />year if and when the septic system falls. Ayes 4, nays 1. Butler <br />voted nay. MotKon carried. <br />Barrett stated the document could perhaps be don© In conjunction <br />with the settlement for litigation. <br />Harren asked that he not be required to Incur additional legal <br />expense. <br />Callahan noted the cocument Is to protect the City and the City <br />will draft the appropriate document. He added, the City is not <br />recommending to Harren that he sign such document. <br />Goetten stated she felt the City had been dealing with all owners <br />in good fe*th with regard to this project. <br />IS