My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
09-14-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2024 1:25:25 PM
Creation date
4/12/2024 1:21:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To; <br />Prom; <br />Date <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager <br />July 29, 1992 <br />Subject; Subdivision #1759, Karen & Patrick Proft <br />Septic Review <br />The purpose of this review is to determine whether the lot <br />line rearrangement will adversely affect the siting of an <br />alternate drainfield for future use for 70 Myrtlewood Road as the <br />proposed change will decrease the size of this lot. <br />Steve Schirmers' report dated July 14, 1992 indicates that <br />no conforming alternate septic site is available for the parcel <br />in question. Soil borings indicate that a mound system would be <br />required but property size, wetland setbacks and steep slopes <br />limit this lot and no site is available which would meet state <br />and city codes. The report also indicates that the lot line <br />rearrangement would not adversely affect future septic siting due <br />to the proximity of this area to the wetland. <br />Site inspect n confirmed that the land to be divided off <br />from 70 Myrtlewooa Road would not be suitable for drainfield <br />siting. This area is mostly wetland with the remainder lying <br />within 70* of the wetland and therefore would not be suitable for <br />future drainfield siting. <br />To summarize, 70 Myrtlewood Road is already too small to <br />contain an alternate drainfield site. The proposed land sale <br />does not change this situation. Obviously this property would <br />benefit by acquiring land suited for an alternate drainfield site <br />if such land exists along its boundaries. <br />Isv
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.