Laserfiche WebLink
H <br />? ■ <br />MINUTES OF THE RECMILAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 10. 1992 <br />(•e) »1752 GEORGE W. KALWEIT. <br />4295 FOREST LAKE DRIVE > <br />REQUEST FOR REFUND OF DOUBLE FEE <br />Mabutth •xplain«d that this issua was not addrssssd at tha last <br />masting as the Item was placed on tha consent agenda. <br />Qoattan fait they should not automatically place zoning items on <br />the consent agenda. She felt the double fee is not applicable In <br />this situation. She was told the Kalweits had requested their <br />builder to get a permit and he did not. <br />It was moved by Goetten. seconded by Mayor Peterson, to waive the <br />double fee for Application S1752 for George W. Kalweit. 4255 Forest <br />Lake Drive. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />Callahan asked staff to research the possibility of adopting an <br />ordinance requiring the builder to pay the double fee if the <br />necessary permits are not obtained. <br />(•7) 91753 SKIP MADGE. <br />875 FOREST ARMS LANE - VARIANCES <br />Skip Madge was present for this application. <br />Mabusth explained that an area of newly installed landscape area <br />underlain with plastic is located within the 0-75* zone, which tha <br />applicant has agreed to reeiove. In that aaie# area there la a <br />puaiphouse. 3x4’ and 3* high. This was installed by the previous <br />owner. A lock box, which was located in the area, has been <br />reinstalled on the concrete under the deck near the house. She <br />continued, a shed within the 75-250* is located partially within <br />a 20* utility easement. There is not a record of a permit for this <br />structure. The proposed pool is to be located in the 75-250* zone. <br />The house is approximately 275* from the channel. Total hardcover <br />within the 75-250* zone will be approximately lOS. The majority of <br />hardcover is within the 250-500* zone, at 42*4*. Total hardcover <br />within the 75-500* setback zone is proposed at 25.3S. Mabusth <br />stated a major reason why the denial opinion voted against this <br />application at the Planning Commission meeting was that the <br />drainage improvements have not been inatal led along the property <br />line. The M.C.W.D. has just recently approved the permit for the <br />drainage improvements. <br />Jabbour asked about the cement slab by the driveway. <br />Mabusth stated that the City does not issue permits for such <br />improvements. <br />If:-'.lea