My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
08-24-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 3:01:59 PM
Creation date
4/9/2024 2:58:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />MIIMtUEHAHA CREEK <br />WATERSHED DISTRICT <br />P.O. Box 387, Wayzata. Minnesota 55391 <br />U«£ M!HN£T3K»* <br />board OF MANAGERS: James R Spensley Pres •JonnE Thomas • Rcrtara R Mc Mit <br />Roneo D Efosc-:»C ’.'Axxirow Love • Claivson iinciey • Thomas Macte ji <br />July 13, 1992 <br />I <br />VIA TELECOPIKR/591-46fi5 <br />Ms. Valery Reinaas <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation <br />Metropolitan District <br />2055 North Lilac Drive <br />Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 <br />A‘JG 1 ^V , , • <br />. * ^ • 1* <br />Re: Preliminary Review of Trunk Highway 12 Alternative Route <br />Dear Ms. Reinaas: <br />The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD") wishes to <br />emphasize several key points which the MCWD has offered in its <br />earlier written and oral comments on the draft scoping decision <br />document presenting the Environmental Impact Study Alternatives <br />for Trunk Highway 12 (Long Lake to Delano). A copy of our earlier <br />written romments is again enclosed for your reference. <br />project is of significant interest to the MCWD, because <br />all of the proposed alternatives cross a number of wetland areas <br />heart of the District for at least six miles, <br />tnis stage of the process, our comments are preliminary in <br />nature, and focus specifically on the wetland and stormwater <br />management issues presented by this project <br />o .Manager Erickson stated at the public hearing, the MCWD <br />Board of Managcis concluded, at its June 16, 1992, regular <br />meeting, that none of the proposed alternative routes, as <br />currently presented, meet the MCWD*s standard of providing the <br />minimum impact on wetlands and stormwater storage capacity. Based <br />T the preliminary information available to date, however, it <br />would appear that the broadly-drawn southerly route may be the <br />easiest to change in order for the project to meet the District’s <br />minimum impact criteria. Nevertheless, with engineering and <br />design changes, the other broadly-drawn routes could also be <br />substantially modified to meet the minimal impact standard. For <br />i <br />fRE copy
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.