My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
08-24-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 3:01:59 PM
Creation date
4/9/2024 2:58:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE July 11, 1992 <br />Hurr noted the license approvals on Site I and Site 2 were <br />based on there being a valid CUP with the City of Wayzata. <br />MOT I ON: Hurr moved. Rascop secorl"d, to recommend apfiroval of <br />the revised plan for the Wayzata ^ .cht Club Site 2. conditiotied <br />on a valid CUP existing between the Yacht Club and the City of <br />Wayzata. and subject to meeting all LMCD dock license Codes with <br />no boat storage on the platform. <br />VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. <br />4. Styrofoam in Dock Construction (Orono Ordinance) <br />The committee received a copy of an orditiance proposed by <br />the City of Orono prohibiting the use of non-encased styrofoam as <br />a dock flotation device. Babcock suggested adding "including but <br />not limited to" to the last line of Section 1. Items I and 5. <br />Hurr and Rascop indicated an interest in nilopling a similar <br />ordinance. G r a t hwo1 said the LMCD should get the benelit of <br />Orono's public hearings before making a decision. <br />Thibault reported White Bear Lake Conservation District ha.s <br />no ordin.ince. but it did establisli a policy requiring replacement <br />of slvrofoam dock.s over a period of lime as a condition of ap <br />proval for dock licenses. <br />Hurr said she believes the 1/1/9J date in the Orono Ordi <br />nance is too soon. She would prefer a longer period of time for <br />the dock owners to comply. Babcock and Markus thought a three <br />year conversion date would be reasonable with a restriction <br />prohibiting use of tton-encased styrofoam for new construction of <br />structures on Lake Minnetonka. <br />There was discussion of the use of styrofoam in other struc <br />tures on the lake such as swimming platforms. The consensus of <br />the committee is that styrofoam, unless encased, should be banned <br />from the Lake. <br />The City of Orono is to be forwarded a copy of this meet <br />ing’s minutes, recommending to the Board that LMCD fav^or banning <br />non-encased styrofoam from the lake oji any st ructures placed in <br />the Lake. The committee further recommends the Board approve <br />deletion of 3.a and 3.b in the Ordinance, keeping 3.c requiring <br />elimination of non-encased styrofoam by 1/1/95. <br />5. Storage of Commercial Watercraft <br />wood Ordinance) <br />at Residential Sites (Orcen- <br />The committee received a copy of the City of Greenwood <br />Ordinance prohibiting the storage of commercial watercraft in R-1 <br />and R-2 residential districts. <br />Babcock no*ed the Ordina'ce does not apF)ly to rental of <br />private dock s|)aces. He also noted the (.'rdinance is basically <br />limited to charter boats by the reference to the watercralt <br />having its own captain and crew. <br />Grathwol said this, aeain. uses the word "commercial" in a <br />context differettt than tlnit used by the LMt.’D. <br />The committee asked staff to forward copies of the Greefiwood <br />ordinance to the other cities and ask for their comments.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.