08-10-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

imM- '■*toning Pil« 11749 July 16, 1992 fftg« 2 lerlptioB of Roquost M',-- Tho applicant proposes the division of Lot 4, Tanglewood into two parcals. Lot 1, the developed lot shall continue to achieve access via Tract B of RLS #1418. The owner of Lot 4 has never developed an ac<7«S8 off of Tanglewood Road. Lot 1 will remain a through lot. All RR-IB area and setback standards have been satisfied for the existing structures on proposed Lot 1. All existing structures and septic drsinfield area neat the required setback of the shoreland district. Baeh of the lots neet the required width of 200* at the rear of the front street setback of 50'. As already noted above. Lot 2 will aehleTS access via Tanglewood and will be subject to all the private eovenants currently in effect. The new curb cut or access at Tanglewood will require approval of the Public Works Director. Review Exhibits D and E 1-2. Weckman's memo confirms that each g£te has adequate area for development of conforming on-site septic systeas• Staff has included the road section for Tanglewood and the prelininary and final subdivision resolutions granting approval of the plat (Inhibits I, J and K). Note that in 1978 the paving of private Sdads was not required. Portions of the road have been paved by l^fidiiVldual property owners. As the enclosed resolutions note, there asa private covenants for maintenarce purposes in place and the City had obtained the necessary access and utility easements over the road aatiot. Let 1 will neet the area requirements for a guest house use a _______^ I ^ 1 siAv»vjraa#g r>Lot 1 is shown at 4.42 acre. The guest house is currently served by %il# •xlating ••ptic system that aarvea the reaidence ai*i alternate septic testing confirms that the guest house will continue to be ssrved by a shared system. In reviewing the records (Exhibits M and R), staff notes that the guest house was constructed in 1967 and the enrrent residenos in i960. The code at that time wuld have required a CMSnditional use permit for a guest house. Staff is not- clear as to ths ralevance of the information written out on buildinc, permit for gmost hssise as RL8 #1410 was not approved until 1978. At any rate, no subdivision would have had an impact on the guest house use because of its proximity to the principal structure. S^-aff should have required a conditional use permit. The Planning Commission must make a rocommeodation concerning the need for applicant to file a current conditional use permit for the guest house. The pond on Lot 1 has existed on the property for many years and wna probably installed by the original owner. In the past; the City has always asked for a drainage easement over the defined or existing ratantion areas. Staff would recommend that *^he City obtain a drainago easeswnt over the pond area. ill: