08-10-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

■')£ v‘W-"r.p h'y' ^V' ix Pr.b-i:- ,-K ■ . ■ Memo July 24, 1992 Page 2 i-'■ '■ I'" sV.;: '?* < i-x f, , A- Pkm' ,-N. '.«V, ■■■ ^- f>i, V I/' k^lrut.^. tv *p >■ 1*.. ^TV V-> ••. '*T‘ |•:•v v'j ■ .-•i ’ii; it-?:..: it,If. fc. .f'- it- .M *. te ISA Boundary Anei snt The a1:^ached map and legal description indicate the proposed new MUSA boundary. Only properties which were included in the Stubbs Bay project area are involved. Although no future sewer extensions are anticipated to be needed outside the current boundary, any future expansion would require a future MUSA line amendment. Also, the capacity of the system downstream from Stubbs Bay would limit the nurober of additional future units to fifty or less in this area of Orcno. Note that while the Stubbs Bay MUSA boundary amendment is considered as Conp Plan Amendment No. 4, Comp Plan Amendment No. 3 (which updates the Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan and adds other already sewered areas to the MUSA) has been delayed since earlier this yex]^ pending staff submittal of additional requested information, which has recently been submitted. It has been indicated that Comp Plan Amendment No. 3 will result in a Met Council review of our rural development policies (2 and 5 acres zones versus Met Council s 64 units per 640 acres'* policy). Notice for the August 3rd public hearing has been published and notice mailed to neighboring cities, although such mailed notice is likely not required since there is likely no effect on those cities. The public hearing process is required for any amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, as indicated on page CMP 10-3. Staff R ndation Staff recommends that Planning Commission forward a recommendation to Council for approval of inclusion of the Stubbs Bay sewer project area within the MUSA boundary, per the attached map and legal description. ch i-'V; ■ h“'.' . 4 .H J I i