07-27-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

>1*. * 4. 5. B.The residence was constructed in the early 1940's prior to setback requirements and prior to the City's shoreland regulations developed in 1973-75. C.The City has received no written or oral comments from adjacent property owners. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City, The City Council has considered th 3 application including the findings and recomme i-i itions of the Planning Commission, reports by City stair, comments by the applicant and the effect of the variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLOSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or City Council hereby grants Section 10.22, Subdivision three season porch located excess of hardcover exists 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) as the side lot line instead following conditions: more of the above findings, the Orono a variance to Municipal Zoning Code 2 permitting structural repairs of a in the 75-250' setback area where an at 39.58% and a variance to Section porch structure is located 2' 9" from of the required 10', subject to the 1.Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 27, 1993). Page 2 of 4 kr' fe