Laserfiche WebLink
Mi- M. ■:)A <br />! <br />t <br />r'I <br />tl:n. <br />i»i'4 <br />i I, <br />* 1i'0.m <br />II <br />■I''-fe. <br />. k.rj H - <br />t.t-( - ■’M. <br />•;■■ <br />Ii- <br />i-fe'; <br />• *- »- <br />' *• ■ <br />mm in <br />4. <br />5. <br />B.The major structural repair of deck did not <br />involve an expansion from the existing building <br />envelope. <br />C.The lots on Casco Cove are located on a curved <br />portion of shoreline and the slight encroachment <br />of the average setback line has no real impact on <br />the views from the adjacent residences. <br />D.The City nas received a letter approving the <br />reconstruction of the deck from the neighbor <br />receiving the most impact from the existing deck. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br />this property are peculiar to it and do not apply <br />generally to other property in this zoning district; <br />that granting the variance would not adversely affect <br />traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard <br />or other danger to neighboring property; would not <br />merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to allevi’'^s a demonstrable hardship or <br />difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code <br />and Coflprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application <br />including the findings and recosuitendations of the <br />Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br />the applicant and the effect of the variances on the <br />health, safety and welfare of the ccmmunity. <br />O0MCLO8IOHS, QRDEB AMD COHDITIONS <br />Based upon one os more of the above findings, the Orono <br />City Council hereby grants variances tc Municipal Zoning Code <br />Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B), Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 <br />and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) that will approve the major <br />structural repairs to an existing deck located 1* 3* in front of <br />an average lakeshore setback, improvements to t structure where <br />excesswc of hardcover exist within the 75-250' setback area at <br />5,046 s«f. or 45.6% and where the deck is located 9* instead of <br />the required 10* from the north side lot line. This approval is <br />subject to the following conditions: <br />Page 2 of 4