Laserfiche WebLink
hx:- <br />m <br />i. ■ • <br />K'-'-’te. <br />r"t: <br />N ^ <br />n. <br />I - <br />m <br />i <br />tv • <br />r;r.rVv.- <br />q-.,>m <br />'V- <br />I’-'XX <br />• <br />>^r <br />>'* <br />' <br />h. <br />i} ■».< <br />y-.i <br />‘I;. <br />;•■ <br />;- '• <br />:X‘',.-\f <br />. :.'t-*;V^. ^ <br />y0:y ■ <br />i <br />^0y . ■ <br />-i- <br />:r-^'y:''yx <br />XV <br />Wx^ T. :.f%- <br />m^‘- <br />;if- <br />^•• '-• ' <br />• • '. ' ;. *t ■• <br />% <br />3 <br />%Toi Chairman Kelley and Planning Commisi ion Membra ^ <br />Mayor Peterson and City Council ^^ <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building « Zoning Administrator^^' <br />Dates <br />Subjects <br />July 9, 1992 <br />0 <br />'J <br />#1752 George W. Kalweitf 4265 Forest Lake Drive - After the <br />Fact Variance - ?*ublic Bearing <br />Pertinent Ordinances <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) ~ Lakeshore setback variance <br />required for major structural improvements of existing deck <br />located within 75' setback area. <br />Allowed ■ 0 <br />Existing « 69' <br />Variance *= 6' or 8% <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 <br />A.0-75' setback area <br />Allowed ■ 0 <br />Existing - 305 s.f. <br />13,725 s.f. <br />Propo sed “ 105 s.f. <br />B.75-250' setback area = 24,075 s.f. <br />Allowed “ 6,019 s.f. or 25% <br />Existing * 5,456.3 s.f. or 22.6% <br />No hardcover variances required for approval of structural repair <br />within 75-230' setback area. <br />Xilst of Bzhibtts - <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Nap <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Plan <br />B > Building Permit for Screening in of Porch <br />F - Building Permit for Residence 12/29/69 <br />G - Topographic/Grading and Drainage Improvements for Forest <br />Arms Plat <br />B - Forest Arms Plat <br />I - Survey <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant's contractor was stopped in the process of completing <br />Structural repair of an existing 8'x60* deck at the lake side of the <br />existing residence. Based upon the inspector's observations at the <br />site, it appeared the structure could be located within the 75* <br />setback area. Applicant was asked to provide a survey on file for the <br />necessary building permit. Applicant filed a variance application as