Laserfiche WebLink
:i <br />h <br />th <br />Dd <br />im <br />no <br />t. <br />il <br />II <br />ry <br />a <br />t« <br />'a <br />v4 <br />1 <br />• <br />i <br />- ''ft* <br />J■:iA <br />,>:-■ ',j <br />■v^: <br />b.The access drive has existed on the property for many years <br />and has never been a safety issue. <br />c.The existing circular drive serves not only a functional <br />purpose but helps to maintain the estate-like character of <br />this unique property. <br />5.All newly created lots have been found to meet th»j standards of <br />Ordinance #101, 2nd Series, an ordinance establishing regulations <br />for the aanagement of shore lands within the City. All proposed <br />structures will meet the required 100' setback measured at the <br />929.4 elevation of Tanager Lake, designated by the DNR as e <br />recreational development lake. All septic systems are to be <br />located 75' from the 929.4 elevation. <br />6.All lots have been found to meet the standards of the RR-IB Rural <br />Residential Zoning District. All pro{.osed residential structures <br />will need a 26' setback from the wet ands located at the 932.3 <br />elevation and all septic systems will meet the required 75' from <br />the 932.3 elevation. <br />7.There is no need to provide future road extensions to the south* <br />east or west because of the location of the railroad to the <br />south, Tanager Lake shoreline to the south and west, extensive <br />wetland area to the east and north, and steep topographies and <br />heavily treed areas to the isusediate west. <br />■OH, TBRRBFORB BE IT RBSOLVBD, that based upon one or more of the <br />indings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves <br />he preliminary plat application of Albert D. Hanser per the survey dated <br />etober 1, 1991, revised May 21, 1992, by Mark S. Grorberg of Coffin t <br />ronberg, Inc. and grants a variance to Section 11.33, Subdivision 4 that <br />ottld allow a driveway to serve a three lot subdivision where the code <br />ould require a private road based on the following flndingsi <br />1 <br />ik e The location, the proposed density at 3 unit per 30 acres and the <br />fact that there is no need to acquire future road access or <br />extensions to the east, south or west reduces need for private <br />road installation. <br />2.The installation of a driveway will minimize the impact on the <br />removal of trees within this hea/ily wooded area of mature trees* <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />mmm