07-13-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

P*.:' W. ¥■ i'w- ^•i it f't^ Soiling Pile #1742 June lOf 1992 Page 2 List of Inhibits A - Application B1*2 “ Applicant's Addendum C - Property Owner’s List D - Plat Map Bl-2 - Survey p - Ploor Plan Cl-2 - Building Elevation Deseriptioa of Bequest Applicants propose a family/room garage addition to the east side of the existing residence and a 16'x28' bedroom addition to the south side requiring the approval of multiple setback variances. Applicants own '' lots. Lots 22 through 24 and 1 through 3 have been legally combined under two separate PID's but because of the 12' alley ••parationf applicants have been unable to legally combine all parcels. The City will attempt to file the legal combination at the City offices. If Coun*:y refuses the legal combination, the City will ask applicants to execute a special lot combination as a condition of the Multiple variance approval. Though applicants' addendum Exhibit B# suggests that a rear setback variance would not be required upon the legal combination, staff would hold that the rear setback for a principal structure would still be required because of the 12* alley. Zn previous applications dealing with setback from unpaved alleys irtiere properties are legally combined on both sides of alley, the 10' fi^tback wa. still required. T’ j legal combination will have an impact OB lot coverage. Zn reviewing Exhibit D, it should be noted that the Coonty has approved previous legal combinations of properties divided by the 12* alley so it appears that the County has already approved eimilar legal combinations. The applicants also propose the removal of the existing detached garage that encroaches 2' within the Dickinson Street right-of-way and the temporary garden shed. The City cannot consider the vacation of the 12* alley as it is currently used by property owners to the south for access. Cuirent proposal shows the detached garage with doors facing towards alley. Applicants will also achieve access from 12* alley. Although actual OOtback to alley is shown at lO'#", the garage will be li'8* from the portion of the traveled or developed alley right-of-way. A new curb out onto public right-of-way must be approved by the Public Works PopartSMnt. It appears that the limited setback distance will Booeasitate portions of the turn around to be located on the public right-of-way and should also be approved by the Public Works Pof^tment. i ■? 1 r.m