Laserfiche WebLink
'I * ; <br />m <br />t*^,vtrmm- <br />1'" M'V--fciV'i <br />m:- <br />:i \ <br />fp' <br />f i^'' <br />Sif ’ X'’ Ifr: <br />■IV'l. <br />Its' <br />i't. <br />i?i'Ifw <br />r <br />•fe*' <br />mi <br />It; <br />:''ss <br />i'^-V <br />: ;t# sfttfs. <br />--■i, <br />E%^s>s, <br />V-' <br />i n p- <br />■f: <br />'> - ; ftt#' <br />Zoning File 11741 <br />July I, 1992 <br />Peg* 3 <br />MditiOBal CcMMnta and i>lannlng CoHalssion RecoMendation <br />Additional Bzhibit <br />J - Amended Survey <br />The applicants have provided <br />proposed structure on the property, <br />but stre <br />an amended survey placing the <br />Note side setback remains at 8* <br />street setback is improved from 20* to 23.1*. Revised setback <br />facts are as follows: <br />Required - 50* <br />Proposed “ 23.1* <br />Variance ■ 27*9"55.0% <br />The Planning Commission advised the applicant that in <br />recosusending approval of e variance as proposed, approval is <br />conditioned on the existing torage shed Ic/cated in rear yard being <br />relocated to conform to IQ' side setback. Applicants agreed with the <br />reco—sndation of the Planning Commission. <br />I <br />1 <br />Planning Commission members accepted the hardship statement of <br />applicants and unanimously approve the proposed variances as requested <br />by the applicants. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted <br />per the Planning Commission's recommendation. <br />: <br />I aili ........