Laserfiche WebLink
"rjir * '’i ' • j;•X-t-' <br />I|s ¥'5:S" <br />21- <br />pm <br />V. <br />^%<n <br />fe-.. <br />U’t ?‘-iv <br />Npi.. <br />■'hf'.. <br />rSi <br />ill' <br />V:v <br />III <br />m&.«€' <br />'i <br />To flNi City Council and Citizens of the City of Orono <br />ItlM 1, 1992 <br />■^P^l^ary eofllrol it mainuinad at the department level through the issuance of purchase orders. <br />Bapeaditures are monitored during the year, and any recommended adjustmems to the budget are <br />preiented to the Council for approval by City management. Unused appropriations lapse at year-end; <br />however, the Council may approve carryover of specific items. <br />The financial ttatemwits ami schedules included in the Financial Section of this report reflect the City's <br />continued adierencc to sound financial management. <br />GBtElUL GOVniNMlMT FtmCTIONS <br />IIm fbllowil^ ichedule presents a summary of General Fund. Special Revenue Funds, and Debt Service <br />Funds revenue for the year eroded Decem^r 31, 1991, and the amount and percentage of increases or <br />decreases in reltfion to the prior year revenue. <br />Revenue Amount <br />Percent <br />of Total <br />Increase <br />(Decrease) <br />From 1990 <br />Percent of <br />lncrea.se <br />(Decrease) <br />Taxee <br />Licenses and permits <br />Imergoveminemal <br />Charges for services <br />Fines <br />Special assessments <br />Interest <br />Other revenue <br />1.682.260 <br />81.202 <br />178.901 <br />726.118 <br />72.728 <br />139,008 <br />324.180 <br />41.631 <br />51 m% <br />2 50 <br />5 51 <br />22 37 <br />2 24 <br />4 30 <br />10.00 <br />1.28 <br />44.617 <br />(55.350) <br />43,389 <br />(32.251) <br />(35.503) <br />(31.490) <br />(38,913) <br />(62.224) <br />2 72 % <br />(4053) <br />32 02 <br />(4.25) <br />(32.80) <br />(18.47) <br />(10.72) <br />(59 91) <br />100.00 % S (167.725)(4.9I)% <br />Tteies are the largM source of revenue, con^rising S! .80% Licenses and permits revenue continued <br />10 dedine in 1991 as the oonuruction slowdown continued; however, early indications for 1992 reflect <br />an upturn. The increase in intergovernmental revenue is due to increased State aid for street maintenance <br />Mi increased County aid for the recyciing/cleanup program The chiuges for services revenue deoeased <br />due ID i reduction in applications for variances, subdivisions, cemdition use. and plan/site exam fees, all <br />lUlMad to foe penaral decline in the building/construction area. Fines revenue declfoed fonher than <br />mtpecMd due to the Court’s general use of conuminny savice in lieu of fines for cottia offonses. In <br />ru^KMUM to the comiiwing traid of deermning fines revemie. the City rebid iu contract for prosecution <br />lervicn In 1991. The result wUI be a signifleam reduction in prosecution costs for 1992. The decrease <br />hi mieiimini revenue is a aanirai progression since no new signifleam assessments wwt levied <br />hi 1991. The bMr«M rcvmiue deernse reflects the decrease in earnings rams fftmi 1990 %o 1991. The <br />ofoer revemii decreiae is mostly a resuh of die (focline in pmk tfodication fees from 1990 lo 1991, which <br />tff tM 10 fubdIvakMii «id cthw land use applicaitom <br />The foNowfog tchedidt preients a summary of General Fund. Special Revenue Funds, and Debt Service <br />thuds iipeiidilufei for the year ended Decembm’ 31. 1991. and the amoum and percemagt of mcreaam <br />or dKTMMi in rOlalion to the prior yem expenditures For purposes of this analysis, ctutmu and capital <br />OUlUqf art combined by function <br />C I- <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />- aik. -.r