Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />r <br />% <br />_ ^ i'i.''- <br />^:4f. <br />PM'-'\ <br />& <br />liii- <br />^.-'Smi-■■icife. <br />im <br />E%m <br />Ba.i- <br />:Mk'- <br />if <br />I# <br />^■"11 <br />:vv- <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 8, 1992 <br />ZONINQ FILE #1679 - CONT. <br />Moors# explained that this Is a request for a hardcover variance <br />to construct a 22’x26’ detached garage, replacing an existing <br />garage, and for an after-the-fact variance for structural <br />Improvements to a gazabo/bathhouse located within the 0-75’ setback <br />area. <br />Qoetten noted that even after the Stop work Order, construction <br />continued on the gazebo. She was concerned about precedent setting <br />with this Issue and reminded the Council of others with similar <br />applications that had been denied. <br />Miller stated that he had applied for a permit for the garage and <br />during the process the Inspector noted the work being done to the <br />gazebo. He said he was unaware of Orono’s restrictions on <br />hardcover. He added that after the Inspector had asked him to stop <br />work on the structure, very high winds threatened to knock down the <br />structure so some of the siding was added to the structure to <br />prevent this. He said he did not continue work on the decking or <br />stalrway. <br />Qoetten asked Miller if he called <br />this need to continue work. <br />the Inspector to notify him of <br />Hiller said he had not caMed the City office. <br />Qoetten said she was glad that the Council <br />application back to the Planning Commission <br />figures had changed since that review. <br />had referred the <br />as the hardcover <br />Miller explained that he was originally using a survey from 1968, <br />which was determined to be incorrect. <br />goettten pointed out that Is the reason for asking for <br />comprehensIve review of the entire property. <br />Jabbour reviewed that the structure serves as access to the lake <br />and the applicant is entitled to a stairway to the lake. He had <br />no problem with agreeing with the Planning Commission <br />recommendat I on on the gazebo. He said he has a problem with <br />people feeling that since a non-conforming structure Is existing, <br />they have a right to maintain that structure forever. He asked <br />•teff If the applicant would be paying the appropriate after-the- <br />fact fees. <br />Mabwith concurred that the additional fee# would be charged for the <br />gazebo portion of the project. <br />k <br />'a'