Laserfiche WebLink
\.:.^r»>l’tA' :' '■ V.%i. <br />;^i^- •■ <br />^■i^- <br />::Vj’:> , <br />• iri^sr'.'. ,.» <br />'r. «■■ <br />i,; <br />t-- <br />rw <br />,#•' <br />' tiii ■■•’1lp. <br />^0% <br />’-'^v <br />K. <br />3it;.',-i- •: .wm^iimm, <br />Met Council Rural Area Policy - Data Compilation June 23, 1992 Page 4proposes a 3 acre residential lot at 650 North Brown Road which <br />the City allowed to connect into the adjacent City of Long Lake <br />sewer system in 1986; the 4 acres adjacent to Wayzata Country <br />Club/North Ferndale, which was recently platted into two 2 acre <br />building sites; the 24 acre Long Lake sewer property; and 140 <br />acres o£ area along North Shore Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road <br />which encompasses 20 properties which were served with sewer <br />either in 1963 (adjacent to the original Orono trunk line) or <br />which were part of the North Shore/Scotch Pine Lane project in <br />19tl. <br />Arguably, we are proposing only 31 acres of new service <br />area, because the 140 acres near Noerenburg Park has been sewered <br />and connected for 10 years or more, and consititutes no change in <br />flows to the Metropolitan Sewer System. However, we have been <br />advised that, even though Met Council has a history of allowing <br />US to connect new sewer projects into their system without a <br />prior MUSA revision, this policy can no longer be followed and <br />Stubbs Bay (199 acres) must be added on to our current MUSA <br />amendeent proposal. <br />Met Council apparently won't officially declare our <br />emendeent major or minor until we provide the additional <br />information requested in February. Glenn Cook and I are <br />currently in the process of compiling this information. It seems <br />likely, however, that it ^ going to be considered a major <br />amendment. <br />Our current Plan Amendment is a response to the 1988 Met <br />Council Systems Statement which directed that we address certain <br />issues and update our Comp Plan to be consistent with Met Council <br />Sewer Policies. This was to be completed by January 1990. The <br />City asked for and received a formal extension to October 31, <br />1990. The Met Council informally approved extensions of that <br />deadline through the actual submission of our Sewer Plan <br />Amendment in January 1992, which suggests that they in the past <br />have not been intent on forcing Comp Plans to be revised into <br />conformity in a specific time fiame, even when such edict takes <br />the form of a Systems Statement. <br />The City may have unknowingly got itself into a box by <br />agreeing to proceed with MUSA line revision for the Long Lake <br />sewer plant property in a timely manner. At the time that <br />agreement was made, the City did not have any expectation that <br />Met Council would be forcing the issue of inconsistent density <br />policies, given their complacency of the previous dozen years <br />while the City developed on its merry way pursuant to the 1980 <br />Comprehensive Plan and the 1988 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br />wmmm