My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 10:38:22 AM
Creation date
4/1/2024 10:35:43 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
•'WV <br />tV ■'" <br />. t \*'\ i <br />♦ j;\ <br />;i&4 ■'>1 <br />.- >.5S <br />■Vi’ .r*' • •.. . <br />_2-1*.LV W><3fiw^><i» <Ai>.^-V:-ift-- <br />'♦Vi?:**-«r>-ri./^^ •.* \¥^.v7 <br />Zoning Pile 11367 <br />Additional O <br />I'ay 3, 1989 <br />nta and Planning rnit iiolon Re lodation * <br />Neighbors of the Harris property (Mr. Taylor to the <br />Ljunediatc west and Mr. P Mrs. Butterfield to the imxiujdlatc south) <br />appeared before the Planning Commission to voice their concern, <br />toth Mr. Taylor and Mr. Butterfield advised that there were old <br />farm drainage tiles installed within the field that eventually <br />drained under Watertown Road through the Butterfield property <br />then finally to the Luce Line. Unfortunately, no one was able to <br />locate the placement of the existing underground tile system. <br />The applicant has advised that if indeed in the prococs of <br />installing the pond, the underground tile system is discovered, <br />he would agree to incorporate the existing drainage system with <br />the final design and functioning of the pond. Staff would <br />suggest that if the underground tile system ia discovered by Mr. <br />that the City staff be called immediately to give <br />appropriate direction. Based on the City Engineer’s original <br />comments that noted the minimal size of the watershed and that <br />pond will increase retention. Staff did not feel it was <br />necessary to acquire a drainage casement over the pond area. The <br />Planning Comisaion disagreed in consideration of the information <br />from the neighbors concerning the underground tile system and <br />recommended that a drainage casement be taken over the pond and <br />that if underground tiles were discovered during construction# <br />that the City Engineer make a recommendation regarding an <br />appropriate drainage easement loe taken from the pond to Watertown <br />Road. Mr. Harris agreed to these condlt'^ona. <br />Mrs, Butterfield also voiced concern with the fact that a <br />pond would now be located 50* from their property line. Staff <br />would note that tne proposed pond location will be approxisiately <br />from the road right-of-way with an additional 66* of right- <br />of-way providing 200*> of separation before the Butterfield <br />property line on the south side of Watercown Road. Please note <br />your ordinances have no setback requirements for ponds. Remesiber <br />the prime purpose of this pond is to provide a means to alleviate <br />the moisture content within the soils of the low area of the <br />Harris property. The secondary purpose is a decorative pond. <br />The pond will not be designed to attract wildlife. The applicant <br />plana to fence off the pond even to his own horses. <br />The Planning Conuiiisaion adopted the approval recosimendation <br />subject to the applicant providing a drainage casement over the <br />pond and depending upon the location of the underground tiles In <br />relation to the location of the pond, that the appropriate <br />drainage easement to the southern boundary be provided by <br />applicant. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the <br />Planning Commission*e approval recoi«unendation• <br />X. <br />W <br />m <br />m <br />*
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.