My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1992
>
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 10:38:22 AM
Creation date
4/1/2024 10:35:43 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
V' <br />Sf>- <br />j. <br />k <br />f <br />F <br />bF- <br />I <br />JSte-" <br />f ■I <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 22, 1992 <br />(••7) 1MO STEPHEN HARRIS, <br />3050 WATERTOWN ROAD - <br />RENEWAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3136 <br />It w®8 moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution <br />#3136 for AppIIcatlon #1740, Stephen Harris of 3850 Watertown Road, <br />approvinQ a renewal conditional use permit required for land <br />alterations In excess of 100 cubic yards. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />A) Goetten indicated the newspapers have published an article <br />which may have confused residents about the Pubiic Hearing to be <br />held by MnDot. She noted that meeting is to be held on June 30th. <br />She noted that the Pioneer newsoaper also printed an article <br />indicating that MnDot has approved a plan approving the southern <br />corridor as It Is the best as far as environmental concerns are <br />concerns. She added this position came from a news release from <br />Long Lake and had nothing to do with a decision by MnDot. <br />Jabbour suggested that the City send a notice tc residents of the <br />public hearing to be held by MnDot. <br />B) Jabbour stated he has received cal Is from residents on Cygnet <br />Place regarding the ftaff decision on the assessment. Ha indicated <br />to the residents that the majority of the Council was not concerned <br />about percentages, but rather what a court of law would find to be <br />appropriate charges for the sewer. He was concerned that a deadline <br />has not been Identified. He said at the last Council meeting he <br />pushed for the usage of MSA funds for Leaf Street, and thought the <br />money would be rebated. He thought the money may be used to off <br />set the trunk charges for Cygnet Place If they opt not to Join the <br />project. He felt the Council should meet prior to final date for <br />abatements. <br />Mayor Peterson noted that many residents believe that If MSA funds <br />are used to restore Leaf Street, that money will be used to reduce <br />the assessment. She felt they need to have an understanding of the <br />I ssue in writing. <br />Qoetton stated the Council has gone over-board to reach a fair <br />settlement and the residents should understand fully that a future <br />Council Is In no way bound to participate In future sewer extension <br />should these areas opt not to Join in the project at this time. <br />Jabbour noted that some of the residents on Cygnet Place are <br />working hard to come to a resolve of the Issue. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.