Laserfiche WebLink
Q <br />m <br />Wviv <br />mm- <br />,y?' ':i i; /‘ ■ <br />0' <br />Mte. . <br />«iiav,iiiir,. <br />a) The gazebo/bathhouse structure has existed on the <br />property prior to 1968. Current standards for <br />1973 by ’the''city.^®’'®*'’°'® P*’°Perties were adopted in <br />b) ^ improvements completed for the <br />"*’*= involve expansion of the existing building envelope of structure nor did it <br />involve an intensification of structure. <br />^3.28% hardcover <br />within the 75-250 setback area. Applicant proposes <br />hardcover'^?o °/f 10-53% of existinghardcover to offset proposed structural Improvements. <br />d) The current proposal minimizes the impact on existlno <br />steeper topographies to south side of property. <br />The city Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to <br />ther property in this zoning district; that granting the <br />would not adversely affect traffic^conditions? <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br />property; would not merely serve^ as a <br />venience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br />a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br />llVlTtl applicant7anSi keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. zoning <br />Sie considered this application including <br />reconmendations of the Planning Commission, <br />JffSet staff, comments by the applicant and the\\\ 7oruri?yr""“"“* <br />Page 2 of 6