My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
06-22-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 10:38:22 AM
Creation date
4/1/2024 10:35:43 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
m:h <br />■ <br />U <br />c- <br />0-f ■', <br />regional plan^ and if it meets all environmental uuaiitv standards. An arpropruite land use <br />not require urban-le^’d support services fsuch as highv.a\^. transit or sevsersi UsfsjJiou]dJ::ejX-^ <br />scale compatible with services :ivailjhle and the need to ser^e local market dem;ynds^_TLUilv; <br />extent possible, they should not interfere wuh agricultural yjiyi.tjg.L <br />One category of land uses that mav be approonate in the rural area is neighborhood conven ience <br />retail, such as a grocery store or gasoline station. If it is of an ap propriate scale to serve local <br />residents and does not need urban sev>ere or highways, it mav be appropria te m the 6ener3l_rur,i! <br />use area. <br />F.ven though a particular land use mav be acceptable from a regional pcnpectivc^Jhe CQuncjl wiH <br />not recommend that every community provide for every possible land use in its rural ajeajfjt <br />would not be consistent with local plans. Each community must determine whether parti cujii <br />be compatible with existing uses, local standards and the goals of the com munity <br />Ml !ses would be subject to anv local, regional or state permitting or licensing requirement^ <br />Fj amoleit that mav be acceptable are included in an appcndixjo this document^ <br />lot lizes for all land uses should be determined bv performance standards. At a minimum, thev <br />should ensure at least two sewage disposal drainfic lds on each site, a prirparv drainfield and _a <br />should the original system fail. All development in the general rural use area mus| <br />■ ‘ location, installation, maintenance and on-goingbe subject to the standards for proper desiai <br />monitoring provided bv the CounciPs Wastewater Treatment and Handlim Police Plan to ensure <br />against negative impacts on the environment and the metropolitan wastewater treatment svstern <br />Rural Centers <br />Rural centers historically have served as retail service centers and transportation centers for the <br />surrounding rural area. However, changes in agriculture and rapid urban expansion have changed <br />the traditional rural service roles of many of these small centers to residential areas for urban <br />people and lo'’v.tions for industries with little tie to local agriculture The latter make use of <br />available lab ir n • .i J areas and, by their nature, tend not to be depenaent on close contact with <br />other firms fo: tiir . * upplies or critically dependent on transportation. <br />The Council has identified 35 rural centers, with populations ranging from just over 100 to more <br />than 5,000. Some rural centers, such as Norwood and Young America, encompass the entire <br />corporate limits of the community. Others, such as Lake Elmo, arc small enclaves within a larger <br />rural community. <br />Services avadablc within rural centers vary. Some have central sanitary sewer; others depend on <br />on-site waste disposal systems. Some have central water systems. Some provide the full range of <br />convenience retail stores, while others have only a bar or gas station. Some have small <br />manu&cturing or service businesses; others arc almost exclusively residential. The Council does <br />not support the extension of regional systems to rural centers because of the distance from the <br />urban center the small populations of rural centers. <br />Rural locations in the past decade have been attractive and some, although not all, communities <br />have experienced an upsurge in growth, principally residential development Development trends <br />are down from the highs noted in the early 1970s but continue at modest levels into the 1980s.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.