Laserfiche WebLink
i^iP®v, v. <br />■W- <br />.... <br />■ ■■ <br />c—4iT rr <br />^ j*.. -• <br />*<?■! v:’^:^># <br />rZ-.'^r^ :<jz I: I-- : : =“-::" <br />t>»o. 10, ’=?£<:•;-- ‘^•= = i = ?-E‘.T. •:“-£ = <br />;te,;.' <br />. r'/if* ^ .Do^»*.d Gr5 ”i*r5 ?!■- <br />Grrnc«'i. <br />i=.:r f j • t f , <br />%|sfe,S& ■ <br />• • *?• <br />, -»JSil^ ^ 'c+ C'-rT.c, <br />AW&40ED NO"ICE <br />OF AC^C'EAl op <br />ASSES3t<£NT PURSLlAr.7 <br />MINT>I. STAT. 42^.0ei <br />?■? i: o* ;*r r . <br />^V-' ■ ■ ■ ■ ^ . <br />,^"i'' ' .. . ^ >^fTmKi% <br />JTOi r'>/or o-f ••*«• Cit» c-^ Or c<r o t fVjntciC'?’ 0^^'i:«>«. Fci*. <br />' 0'^‘ftrf £!?'• , C“-yfti* £}>•'. ^'• nr.*? ct » ?'i2 :-C j6-r-. <br />I <br />liP'l? 7 iesikl t^t is«e5«?r»»nt i=o- the f>nii;j-»' «*■»- truhV- <br />•**»--•m }-‘C <br />;rr-OM*n#rt. <br />;‘ ■ ^v; <br />Ac9#?**htf it»tf and eiMegie the toHouMn^: <br />. 'V.I.-pee 1.1 the •fttfi'rert c* the i-eniter* Hf'Mtj tr-.oV' <br />lifid »>’‘ert1 ■ m: OMer^e’*'t , ti.e. StubD? Es» £»-.tj-'’ <br />Sewer- rrrject', idcrtec ;h Ms,' :£. 1*'2. r <br />MI r.n £ 1 1. *.. 42^* .0:1 . <br />^iilP ‘mmB i <br />2. Aooellanti, ere the cimers o-f » certiin c-*»'c*1 c* <br />prccertv which hee a Property ID r-:-. c *' <br />04-117-23-22-000?, end street address o+ 110 Lee*? <br />Street, loceted in the City o-f Or one, Cojntv <br />Henr.ep i n. <br />3. The eeseisment hearing -for the sanitary sewer trur> <br />and lateral improvement, which included the subject <br />property, was originally scheduled ^or May 4, 19*2, <br />However, it was continued and rescheduled -tor May 25. <br />1992. <br />4. For on or about April 29, 1992, appellants sent <br />written objection to respondent. <br />5, On or about May 18, 1992, respondent -formally <br />ted an assessment on the subject property in the <br />-amount ,o^ •18,880. <br />>/« <br />"Bv -'■ iia'-- <br />. .* <br />N-;..1 <br />i <br />'I <br />4 <br />.'1.71 <br />■I <br />•»., <br />.*■ <br />,:il