Laserfiche WebLink
‘u r, . ■ ;;>I f <br />ir;:- <br />i*'■ <br />w <br />.' «,’. ■--? <br />-k <br />m ' i .• • <br />.'Vi-:' ■■*: <br />■'X • v •'■ <br />P. <br />;frV' <br />;.-vv ■ <br />■fe- <br />• ; • • i <br />r> ;• <br />V y‘ -ihiriVp - •-mu: <br />■f: ■ ?■ <br />■«l <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />COUNTY OF HENNEPIN <br />i ©31^3 <br />yM 1 61992 IN DISTRICT COURT <br />ly 'OURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT <br />Case Type: Other Civil <br />Charles A. Balgaard, <br />Appellant, <br />Court File No. <br />vs. <br />city of Orono, a Minnesota <br />municipal corporation, <br />NOTICE OF APPEAL <br />OF ASSESSMENT <br />Respondent. <br />TO: JACK PROVOS. HENNEPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ADMIN7NSTRATOR, <br />AND DOROTHY M. HALLIN, CITY CLERK, CITY OF ORONO. <br />PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the appellant, Charles A. Balgaard, <br />hereby appeals to the above-named District Court from the special <br />assessment adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on <br />May 18, 1992. in connection with the Stubbs Bay Sewer Project. <br />This appeal is from the assessment in the amount of $0840.00, <br />more or less, against the following described land owned by the <br />appellant: <br />3435 East Lake Street <br />PIDI 05-117-23-13-0039, .... <br />Lot 2, Block 8, Bayside Addition to Lake Minnetonka, <br />County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. <br />The nature of the appellant’s claim is, and the grounds for <br />this appeal are, that the subject property will not receive a <br />special benefit from the improvement being constructed; that the <br />amount of the assessment is greatly disproportionate to any <br />resulting increase in the market value of the land; that the <br />proportionate distribution of the improvement's coats among <br />property owners is unequal, illegal, and unfair; that the <br />assessment procedure was illegal, improper, unfair, and