My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
06-08-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 11:30:42 AM
Creation date
3/29/2024 11:27:12 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 <br />lONXNQ FILE #1679 - CONT. <br />Gaffron reported that the proposed garage leaves about a 3* <br />urea of the existing gravel parking area behind the garage whi.n <br />will not be able to be used as parking In the <br />It has bean driven on before and It may be compacted and there <br />fore has been classified as hardcover. <br />Rowlette asked what normal two-car garage dimensions are. <br />Gaffroii noted that It Is about 20 x24 . <br />M111,r oxp1a1n9d that tha normal <br />anu ho is proposing a three car garage with a 20 depth. He Tolt <br />that It Is nacossary to have a three car garage for storage of <br />cars, boats, et:.. Ho also stated that the cost factor would not <br />Justify building a two-car garage. <br />Schrojdor felt that the garage Is too largo <br />concurred. <br />Mcos also <br />M111.P fait that ho has reduced the hardcover down as <br />as possible. Ho also noted the other variances which <br />approved with oxcosses of hardcovor. <br />much <br />were <br />Schroeder responded that each application Is different «1th <br />different merit c • <br />Johnson felt there Is a large amount of hardcover on the <br />property and felt that the hardcover should be reduced. <br />Miller explained that If It Is tabled or <br />aaraae Is not built, then the hardcover stays at 37%, opposed to <br />the 30% proposed. With respect to the bathhouse, <br />out that^only the bottom half of the structure was replaced. <br />Johnson asked about the new slab. <br />Miller stressed that only the foundation for the posts on <br />the lake side were replaced. <br />Rowlette concurred that If the deck/stairway/bathhouse Is <br />alone. - - <br />Gaffron advised that they could. <br />was moved by Cohen, seconded byMoos, to recomaend <br />approval of tho structural maintenance of the bathhouse <br />nays 2. <br />Ayes 3, <br />Johnson voted noy b.csuse ho felt It was basically replacid <br />and Schroeder concurred with that fealing. <br />^ IV>t.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.