Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING <br />HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON <br />HELD MAY 18, 1992 <br />Kniqht asked If the current trunk charge of $5,650.00 would also <br />be reduced by the 30X proposed to be paid by the City. <br />jabbour stated that the 30% was only offered for 100% <br />part Icipat ion. <br />Goetten reminded them that a future Council may choose not to <br />discount the remaining amount. <br />Callahan stated that If the trunk charge is assessed, that area <br />would need to be made a part of a fulI project. He noted that the <br />residents have the 30 day appeal time to further study the project. <br />Jabbour explained that the Council has proceeded with Its best <br />offer and would not reduce the assessment. He stated that It is <br />expected to cost the City approximately $18,000.00 per house pe*- <br />appeai. <br />Goetten noted that the Council Is concerned about the health, <br />safety and welfare of the residents and stated that If that Is the <br />criteria for sewering an area, she hated to exclude anyone because <br />of the cost. <br />Jabbour suggested they order the project to begin, and If at the <br />end of the 30 day appeal period It Is determined that there are too <br />many appeals, drop that portion of the project. <br />It was moved by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to assess the trunk <br />charge to the properties on Cygnet Place, Leaf Street and Oxford <br />Road. Ayes 3, nays 2. Mayor Peterson and Goetten voted nay. <br />Motion falled. <br />Butler explained that when the trunk line is laid along Bayside <br />Road, It will present Itself at the corner of Leaf Street and <br />County Road 84, which will make it available for connection for the <br />properties on Oxford Road, Leaf Street and Cygnet Place. She felt <br />that because of that availability, the trunk charge should be <br />assessed to those properties. <br />Goetten felt that by doing such would be doing the citizens In that <br />area a great disservice. <br />Deterllna clarified that since the submittal of the petition <br />expressing opposition, the cost has been reduced, the DNR has <br />Imposed restrictive regulations, and many feel that sewer is <br />InevI tab Ie. <br />%