Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 18, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1737 - CONT. <br />Hollander stated that the flower planters are built basically like <br />a retaining wall. The deck has no plastic underneath It. He felt <br />the boat house may only be the only Improvement adding pollution <br />to the lake. <br />Cohen reiterated that the concern of the pollution to the lake was <br />made in general. He concurred with Johnson's proposal. <br />Peterson asked about the removal of the screened porch. <br />Indritz stated that the front of the porch area is the front of the <br />retaining walI area designed to hold the water back from running <br />Into the lake. Me noted that Hollander is willing to remove the <br />existing screened porch in exchange for the gazebo and deck <br />structure. <br />Mabusth said the plastic and screened area would be about 2.5% <br />within the 0-75’ setback area. <br />Johnson felt there is an intensification on the property. He <br />stated that 95* of the house is within the 0-75’ zone and there are <br />structures within 14’ of the lake. He felt that the removal of a <br />structure further away from the lake was not an appropriate trade <br />off. <br />Rowlette felt they need to be consistent with other applications. <br />She recommended that the applicant ask that the application be <br />tabled for further consideration. <br />Indritz advised that they concurred with the tabling of the <br />appIication. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Rowlette, to table Application <br />#1 737 for Richard Hollander of 680 North Arm Drive to allow the <br />applicant time to review the issues. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />(#10) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE <br />There was no report. <br />(#11) REPORT BY THE LAKE USE COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE <br />There was no report. <br />(#12) REPORT BY THE FACILITIES COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE <br />There was no report. <br />(#13) OTHER ISSUES