My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
06-08-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 11:30:42 AM
Creation date
3/29/2024 11:27:12 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 18, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1734 - CONT. <br />Mabusth explained that was when a two lot split was proposed of the <br />southern or homestead portion of the property which would have <br />required credit of the wetland areas. <br />It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Johnson, to recommend <br />approval for Application #1734 for John Burger for property at 3750 <br />Bayside Road, for a two lot subdivision, subject to the conditions <br />set forth by staff In the memo to Planning Commission dated May 13, <br />1992. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />Mabusth noted that the on-sIte septic inspector had specific <br />recommendations to the future developers of the property which <br />should be incorporated with the approval. The Members agreed to <br />those conditions being incorporated. <br />(#3) #1079 WILLIAM MILLER, <br />2691 CASCO POINT ROAD - <br />VARIANCE - CONTINUATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING 7:10 - 7:15 P.M. <br />William Miller was present. <br />Mabusth explained that at the last meeting at which the applicant <br />appeared, the original proposal was divided into two parts. The <br />first Issue was the gazebo, which Planning Commission recommended <br />approval of but Council tabled until the complete application was <br />reviewed. The applicant has provided an amended survey showing the <br />setbacks of the structures and a hardcover inventory. In the 0- <br />75’ setback area there is 344 s.f. or 7.64% hardcover; and In the <br />75-250’ setback area there is 4,544 s.f. or 43.28%. Miller <br />provides a reduction of hardcover with a new proposed two stal I <br />garage proposed at 3,438.95 s.f. with a net reduction of 11% <br />hardcover. There is no change In the 250-500’ setback area. <br />Miller explained that the original survey that they were working <br />with was from 1968, which proved to be inaccurate. The main <br />concern of the Planning Commission was that a three car garage was <br />too large for the property and the garage was set off to the side <br />not al lowing for direct access Into It. The garage has been <br />switched to allow direct access and has been reduced. <br />Johnson asked about additional removal of hardcover. <br />Miller stated that the garage and graveled area around the garage <br />has been reduced.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.