My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1992
>
06-08-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 11:30:42 AM
Creation date
3/29/2024 11:27:12 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r- <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 8. 1992 <br />ZONING FILE 81679 ~ CONT. <br />Moors# #xpl#ln#d that this Is a r#qu#st for a hardcover varianc# <br />to const root a 22*x2«’ d#tach#d garag#. replacing an existing <br />garaoa. and for an aftar-tha-fact variance for structural <br />improvements to a gazebo/bathhouse located within the 0-75 setback <br />area <br />Qoetten noted that even after the Stop Work Order, construction <br />continued on the gazebo. She was concerned about precedent setting <br />with this Issue and reminded the Council of others with similar <br />applications that had been denied. <br />Miller stated that he had applied for a permit for the garage and <br />during the procesa the Inspector noted the work being done to the <br />gazebo. Me said he was unaware of Orono’f restrictions on <br />hardcover. Me added that after the Inspector had asked him to stop <br />work on the structure, very high winds threatened to knock down the <br />structure so some of the siding was added to the structure to <br />prevent this. He said he did not continue work on the decking or <br />StaIrway. <br />Qoetten asked Miller If he called the Inspector to notify him of <br />this need to continue work. <br />Miller said he had not called the City office. <br />Qoetten said aha was glad that the Council <br />application back to the Planning CommI sal on <br />figures had changed since that review. <br />had refarred the <br />as the hardcover <br />Miller explained that he was originally using <br />which was detarmined to be incorrect. <br />a aurvef from I986t <br />Qoetten pointed out that Is the reason for asking for a <br />comprehensive review of the entire property.mmmsMstaff If the applicant would be paying the appropriate after-the <br />fact fees. <br />Mabusth concurred that the additional fees would be charged for the <br />gazebo portion of th« project. <br />I <br />i <br />-I <br />.-'W'^fv <br />*1 <br />'r-' <br />A. <br />■.-..■A. . ■
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.