Laserfiche WebLink
U S. OFFlCtS: <br />OtNVCM. COCOHAOO <br />TtL 901 S93-1200 <br />Miami . FlOMiOA <br />TC l 909'ftl0 0090 <br />WAftMiMOTON. O C. <br />Ttw aoi-s«isToo <br />S U ITS 3 300 <br />222 south Ninth stssst <br />MINNCAFOLIS. MINNSSOTA 5S402 <br />TCL 6 1 2 333-4800 <br />FAX 612 334-6868 <br />Thomas J. Barrctt , C so. <br />DtRCCT DIAL <612) 334-2676 <br />May 12, 1992 <br />iNTCANAnONAW O^^tCXX <br />LCI«>I>0. acNMAMy <br />TXC 0II37-41-4SIS47I <br />STurroAPrr OIA mamt <br />TCt. Ot I4S-71 1 29490J <br />FT: <br />♦ 1 .• « <br />r l.'r' <br />if ! <br />1 ’ *- <br />VTA FACSIMILE <br />OWIGIliAL TO FOLLOW BY MAIL MAY 1 5 <br />Jeanne A. Mabucth ... <br />Building and Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Municipal Offices <br />p.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323-006 <br />Re: Application No. 1734 - John and Mary Burger <br />3750 Bayside Road - Preliminary Subdivision <br />Application <br />Dear Jeanne: <br />In response to your letter of May 1, 1992 with respect to <br />the application noted above, I point out that Orono Ordinance <br />601 subd. 2 specifically allows the City to regulate Ptlvatf <br />toads by allowing access over them to other persons who could <br />reasonably be expected to use the toad to get t> their home and <br />to their invitees. As I understand it the potential <br />intensification of the use is probably limited to oca or two <br />home, -h.ch may use the private toad inaccess. The alternative access which has been v-xsuusseo <br />with respect to subdivision would require, as you point out in <br />your letter, a long and lengthy roadway through a designated <br />wetland. <br />I also understand that we can look forward to the new <br />users agreements to share in their prorata costs of the <br />maintenance of the road. <br />Thus, I conclude that the proposed use of Landmark <br />is reasonable under the circumstances and consistent with both <br />our ordinance and other applicable law. <br />TJB/jao/MTTis