Laserfiche WebLink
Tos <br />Froax <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />o,. <br />% <br />7 <br />Chairman K Ic' and Planning Commission Mcriiers <br />Mayor Peternon and City Council ^ <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator ‘V <br />Jeanne A. Mabusthr Building & Zoning Administrator ^ <br />May 12, 1992 <br />#1731 Clair Rood, 3280 Navarre Lane - Variance - <br />Public Hearing <br />’¥Q <br />Fertinent Urdinances - <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) - 3 1/2* high fences/ 11s are <br />nonencroachment* within any yard area. (Review Exhibit G. • <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (E) - 6' high fences/walls allowed <br />in rear yards of properties. (Review Exhibit G.) <br />Section 10.03, Subdivison 15 (P) - 6' high fences/walls allowed <br />within side yards. (Review Exhibit G.) <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 - Traffic Visi?ility - Plantings <br />and structures limited to 3' height within 30' protection zone (Review <br />Exhibit E). <br />Setrion 10.25, Subdivision 6 - LR-lC District required setbacks: <br />Front/street ■ 30* <br />Rear ■ 30' <br />Side - 10' <br />Slde/street ■ 15' <br />Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - setback frcm wetland: <br />Required ■ 26' <br />Applicant seeks height variance for pillars (fencing) installed <br />in proposed front and side street yards of two future building sites <br />(Review Exhibit I). <br />Front <br />Allowed 1/2' <br />Proposed 4 1/2' <br />Variance • 1 or 33.31 <br />Side <br />Allowed ■ €' per Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F). During <br />the preliminary discussions with staff in the <br />preparation of the land a eration application, <br />applicant sought advice as to an allowed height for a <br />wall like structure, tasedi on the property owned by <br />applicant (Review Exhibit H), staff advised that It