My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
05-26-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2024 12:53:30 PM
Creation date
3/22/2024 12:50:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-1 .iP 'V-: ■Pif <br />\t <br />i# <br />Ir:^.v.-Lffcp- <br />m p <br />'ii; <br />•-: y <br />.'M <br />m <br />■m <br />'^-. V, ' <br />K- ...i:.i-i t: u .-. .... <br />■■'* X <br />®fcp- <br />r^- <br />V. <br />:h- <br />toning File #1733 Mey 21, 1992 Page 3MOxtl itM and Planning CoaU-ssion Re<lation <br />Staff has received confirmation from the MCWl) staff that <br />they are reconaending approval of the permit application for Camp <br />Yeko at their Nay 21st meeting. They have concurred with all of <br />the recooBMndations of the Orono staff and in addition would ask <br />that erosion control be shown on the final plans and that <br />spillway areas must also add riprap to the down side of the <br />spillway in order to limit further erosion. Staff will contact <br />the Watershed office on the 26th to verify final confirmation <br />that the Watershed District did indeed act on the application. <br />Applicant was cautioned by Comnission members that Council <br />may not choose to act on the application until the Watershed <br />District had formally approved the permit. Please note the <br />application has been scheduled for Council's review at the May <br />26th meeting at the specific request of the applicant, review <br />Exhibit D. <br />The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the unanimous <br />approval of the Planning Commission based on the findings and <br />conditions set forth in the staff memo and as set forth in the <br />City Engineer's report. Exhibit A. Staff has also included some <br />of the conditions noted by the MCWD staff in their comments. <br />Isv <br />SlifC . <br />■ <br />1. .y.'L
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.