05-26-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

..«.r p;‘' ssj':,- K#':' le -;^'v-Vr ^tev 'm ::v f.'.' ■-•r'.' 'v-:: i!' ■'\''s'',. ■;;*r ■ •■'_ j" V' ^-'Vf ^'il- [■«:: ""r'-. • 31* ■ if 3i-.' *««■ •fefc ■•:, L ul'> -C- fif; Ji'riy Zoning File #1732 May 20, 1992 Page 4 Additional Exhibit J - Applicant's Letter to City Additional ConBents and Planning Coaad.8sion Recoanendatlon The applicant advised that the subdivision will be a 2-lot subdivision and should not be reviewed as a lot ] Ine rearrangement. Lot 2 with a total of 7 acres is proposed ^ a separate single building site. Staff noted that the 70' wide dry bulldable corridor (review Exhibit I) was approved in the original 3*lot plat as a safe access to the 30 m.p.h. public roadway for a private road and will now serve the future driveway. The designated wetlands located within Lot 2 must now be designated at a specific elevation by applicant's surveyor. The applicant also asked for special consideration from the City concerning the staff requirement to fill in the well pit and to abandon the septic system. Staff advised that State law requires the abandonment of the septic system (pumping of tank and filling in of septic tank). Applicant reviewed the size and location of the well pit for Planning Commission members. The Planning Commission members unanimously concurred that the well pit would be a potential hazard and liability for the property owner and concurred with staff recommendation that the well pit be filled In. The Planning Cononisslon recommended unanimrus approval the Z-'lot plat of the subdivision application as proposed adopted the staff conditions for a 2-lot subdivision, enclosed resolution has been drafted for Council's review action. Please note this application has been scheduled at Nay 26th meeting of the Council at the special request of applicant, review Exhibit J. of and The and the the Isv