Laserfiche WebLink
III <br />fr. <br />■h. <br />^:V:f>: <br />»- <br />•i». <br />f <br />'■■ ■- <br />•> <br />fcK'r: <br />lem- <br />(#;:; •'•.* <br />(.rl>‘‘.r. <br />stated that permits should be issued only where the District is <br />satisfied that the applicant will comply with all District <br />standards, based upon review of a completed application, to date, <br />staff has been unable to verify that the project meets applicable <br />tUl^?%eSding receiprof^'iteSris spicified^in^Jtaff°S report. <br />The motion was seconded by Manager LaBounty. Upon vote, the <br />motion carried unanimously. <br />Q2-^n. HiHoitav Corp. — Stormwater management Plan for a <br />17-1ot BiMlft tawilr tMiaentiai subdivision located in the <br />of Chanhaasen called <br />Staff reported that the majority of the proposed site drains <br />to a large onsite landlocked basin. The basin has been determined <br />i;p$!c«rS*s%:opised li ?rt.dule^t ares o£ <br />S?orbl?pTpp^tr«^SS!f\°be%^Snopn! • Hf fba. <br />the developer was coaicerned about whether setback requirements <br />could be met if the size of the pond is expanded. Staff stated <br />that the Wetland Conservation Act has a no-net policy, and <br />that staff believes its recommendation to be consistent with tne <br />Act. <br />It was moved by Manager LaBounty, seconded by Manager Maple, <br />to approve the application, with the permit to be issued upon <br />receipt of those items as set forth in staff’s report in a form <br />and substance acceptable to staff. Upon vote, the motion carried <br />unanimously, with Manager Erickson abstaining. <br />gy-41. Albert D. Hanset...— Stonwater wanaaeaent iXan__________________subdivision located in the Citag^ <br />Prong. <br />staff noted that the site includes some potentially sensitive <br />WBfill*. <br />of those items set forth in staff’s report, in a form and <br />substance acceptable to staff. Upon vote, the motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />■oard UlnatM -4-(04/16/92)