My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
05-26-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2024 12:53:30 PM
Creation date
3/22/2024 12:50:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'* *vV - ' -7";C"' <br />H'"\ <br />h. <br />r <br />,t'- <br />If’ <br />I- <br />% <br />f <br />Lp <br />gf' <br /># <br />'ikr <br />i-..te--- <br />li <br />I <br />t'fl. <br />PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW PROCESS <br />The Council has established separate procedures for major and minor plan amendments. <br />A major amendment is: <br />(1) <br />(2) <br />(3) <br />(4) <br />A complete revision, update or rewrite of an existing comprehensive plan in its entirety; <br />A substantial revision, update, rewrite or addition to a chapter or element of an existing <br />comprehensive plan; <br />An amendment triggered by a proposed development that requires an E. .W or EIS, and is <br />inconsistent with the existing comprehensive plan; or <br />A change (land trade or addition) in the urban service area involving 40 acres or more. <br />The Council may require a local governmental unit to modify the amendment if the Council finds <br />that the plan will have a substantial impact on, or contain a substantial departure from, <br />metropolitan system plans. The local government cannot implement the proposed plan <br />amendment until after the Council has concluded its review. <br />A minor amendment is: any amendment other that a major amendment. Minor amendments <br />wf.hout potential system impact or substantial departure are subject to a 60-day review and <br />comment period for consistency with the Metropolitan Development Guide. The local <br />government can implement the proposea plan amendment before the Council has concluded its <br />review. <br />ISSUE ANALYSIS <br />How should the Council review local plan amendments, and what thresholds or criteria should the <br />Council use to require plan modifications under the new rural service area policy? <br />Minor plan amendments <br />Minor plan amendments, by definition, lave no substantial impact or departure from metropolitan <br />system plans. The Council ’s plan amendment guidelines permit the local government to <br />implement the plan amendment before the Council ’s review is ended. If the amendment is <br />consistent with Council policies, further review is usually waived; or if minor comments are <br />necessary, it is sent directly to the Council ’s consent list. <br />If an amendment is not consistent with the new rural area policy, staff would prepare advisory <br />comments in a MCDC consent list report to explain the inconsistency. However, the local <br />govern ent could still go ahead and implemeiu the plan amendment during the Council ’s review. <br />Major plan amendments <br />The following types of major plan amendments are most likely to raise issues relative to the new <br />rural policy: requests for additions or changes to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); <br />changes in rural area plans or policies; chs ges in the land use plan element; or changes in a <br />sewer or transportation plan element <br />If a major plan amendment is inconsistent with the new rural policies, the Council must determine <br />whether or not it constitutes a substantial impa*.. on or departure from the current metropolitan <br />system plans. If so, the Council may requite the locai governmental unit to modify the plan.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.