Laserfiche WebLink
j- > J-V1, - ■ ,*.">.<■ • T-. ’-?, . V - -.V*', ~T W <br />fe;-few’ <br />l&r <br />MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARINGHELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON <br />HELD MAY 18, 1992 <br />required to connect to sewer within 60 months unless deemed to have <br />a failing system prior to that date. Ayes 5. nays 0. <br />Mayor Peterson said she has a hard time agreeing with Condition #7. <br />Kuehn said the charge is a sewer aval IabiIity charge which is equal <br />to the quarterly blI IIng, which has been estabiished by ordinance. <br />Jabbour felt that amount should be established based <br />needed for maintenance. <br />on money <br />Barrett reviewed that the Counci I was only making policy decisions <br />on the project and would eventually need to amend the ordinances. <br />He stated the availability charge may have fiscal consequences if <br />deleted. <br />Ppb Provo. 220 Cygnet Place, asked if the $50.00 septic inspection <br />fee would still be charged. <br />Mayor Peterson clarified that it would not be charged to parce.s <br />connected. <br />01 I Ie Peterson asked how many years they would be paying on the <br />assessment. <br />Mayor Peterson explained the assessment is set for 15 years at 8X. <br />Moorse eA;>itt!ned that If the City gets a better interest rate, the <br />cost of tho project could be reduced. <br />Mayor Peterson called for a recess from 8:30 p.m. to 8:55 p.m. <br />Knight referred the Bederwood aree residents to the Council for <br />direct dialogue. He clarified that he was never critical of the <br />Council offering t.^ pay 30* of the project up front. He stated the <br />group he represents Is willing to settle for an assessment of <br />$10,500.00. He Informed members of his group that at some point <br />they would need to decide whether or not they wished to appeal. <br />He stated they have determined the fa r amount for the assessment <br />based upon the cost of a new septic system. <br />Linda Whitman Informed the Council that the Bederwood group wished <br />to be excluded from Mr. Knight’s group, and they wished to be a <br />part of the project. She expressed appreciation for the extension <br />of time for hookup. She stated the Bederwood residents wished to <br />retain their right to appeal. <br />8 <br />=ff-‘ ■ wV- -i. <br />X