My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer Public Hearing Agenda
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1992
>
05-18-1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer Public Hearing Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2024 1:56:54 PM
Creation date
3/19/2024 1:56:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
^ - r *" ■^0v-r'-V 1^ <. ; ■¥ <br />:f <br />.‘■i. <br />H, <br />»^, I, <br />^■. '« ,-V^v <br />:vSv:> :■■ <br />if ^ <br />;■ /: <br />% <br />'fes <br />!.i*. <br />W <br />j; !• <br />p <br />p-.p-te <br />|p''- <br />R:.fife <br />[ipfci. <br />MINUTES OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE STUBBS BAY ASSESSMENT HEARING <br />HELD BY THE ORONO COUNCIL ON <br />HELD HAY 18, 1992 <br />Knight asked If the current trunk charge of $5,650.00 would also <br />be reduced by the 30% proposed to be paid by the City. <br />Jabbour stated that the <br />participation. <br />30% was only offered for 100% <br />Qoetten reminded them that a future Council <br />discount the remaining amount. <br />may choose not to <br />Callahan stated that If the trunk charge is assessed, that area <br />would need to be made a part of a full project. He noted that the <br />residents have the 30 day appeal time to further study the project. <br />Jabbour explained that the Council has proceeded with its best <br />offer and would not reduce the assessment. He stated that it Is <br />expected to cost the City approximately $18,000.00 per house per <br />appeal. <br />Goetten noted that the Council Is concerned about the health, <br />safety and welfare of the residents and stated that If that is the <br />criteria for sewering an area, she hated to exclude anyone because <br />of the co^t. <br />Jabbour suggested they order the project to begin, and if at che <br />end of the 30 day appeal period It Is determined that thore are too <br />many appeals, drop that portion of the project. <br />It Mas Movad by Butler, seconded by Callahan, to assess the trunk <br />charge to the properties on Cygnet Place, Leaf Street and Oxford <br />Road. Ayes 3, nays 2. Mayor Peterson and Goetten voted nay. <br />Notion falled. <br />Butler explained that when the trunk line is laid along Bayside <br />Road, It will present Itself at the corner of Leaf Street and <br />County Road 84, which wi I I make It aval I able for connection for the <br />properties on Oxford Road, Leaf Street and Cygnet Place. She felt <br />that because of that availability, the trunk charge should be <br />assessed to those properties. <br />QQ^tten felt that by doing such would be doing the citizens In that <br />area a great disservice. <br />Deter IIng clarified that since the submittal of the petition <br />expressing opposition, the cost has been reduced, the DNR has <br />Imposed restrictive regulations, and many feel that sewer is <br />Inevitab Ie.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.